[Remedy]

Santorum, an orthodox Catholic

Judaism's Sexual Revolution: Why Judaism (and then Christianity) Rejected Homosexuality

Gay Nazis: the Role of Homosexuality in Nazism & Hitler's Rise to ... Thus butch hypermasculinity, visibility for homosexuals, and organization were the three necessary ingredients in the mix which allowed the SA leaders to make their unique and essential contribution to the rise of Nazism. Another important consideration is that visibility is enabled when homosexuality assumes a political voice. In this way, the politicization of homosexuality, which supported gays in the process of socially identifying themselves as such, was a necessary condition for Hitler's success.

Homosexual Manifestos Finally, we will in all likelihood want to expunge a number of passages from your Scriptures and rewrite others, eliminating preferential treatment of marriage and using words that will allow for homosexual interpretations of passages describing biblical lovers such as Ruth and Boaz or Solomon and the Queen of Sheba. Warning: If all these things do not come to pass quickly, we will subject Orthodox Jews and Christians to the most sustained hatred and vilification in recent memory. We have captured the liberal establishment and the press. We have already beaten you on a number of battlefields. ... You have neither the faith nor the strength to fight us, so you might as well surrender now."

Homosexuality and the Nazi Party These men were viciously anti-Jew and anti-Christian because of the injunctions against homosexuality inherent in the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic.

"The Nazi Master Plan: The Persecution of the Christian Churches"

Fascism, corruption and my 'Democratic' Party

GOV : The Godless Party: Media Bias & Blindness—And the Big Story They Missed

I'd describe what homosexuals do in detail, but it's so repulsive I'll let readers look into it. They can decide whether anal intercourse is repulsive, or whether a three-man orgy in a bathhouse is morally equivalent to a married man and woman making new life.

Texas Physicians Resource Council, Christian Medical and Dental Association, Catholic Medical Association

INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE Amici are medical organizations that believe public health policy should be based upon scientific evidence rather than political expediency. They believe that the medical research clearly demonstrates the harmful nature of same-sex sodomy, and that compassionate, caring physicians should discourage such harmful behavior. Amici submit this brief to inform the Court of the public health concerns associated with same-sex sodomy. 1

The Texas Physicians Resource Council is a statewide network of Christian physicians and dentists made up of approximately 500 members. Its purpose is to address medically related ethical issues that affect Texas families, including issues relating to homosexuality. The Christian Medical and Dental Associations (" CMDA") are national organizations made up of the Christian Medical Association and the Christian Dental Association, with over 17,000 members. CMDA promotes evidence-based medicine and addresses policies on healthcare issues. Many CMDA members are involved in treating sexually transmitted diseases worldwide through medical missions to third world countries. The Catholic Medical Association upholds principles of the Catholic faith and morality as related to the science and practice of medicine, and applies principles of faith and morality to modern medical science and practice.

Texas has a legitimate interest in regulating public health, and the CDC has identified sexually transmitted diseases (" STDs") as a public health problem. Sodomy is an efficient method of transmitting STDs. And regardless of the reason, same-sex sodomy is far more effective in spreading STDs than opposite-sex sodomy. Multiple studies have estimated that 40 percent or more of men who practice anal sex acquire STDs. In fact, same-sex sodomy has resulted in the transformation of diseases previously transmitted only through fecally contamin-ated food and water into sexually caused diseases– primarily among those who practice same-sex sodomy. The issue under rational-basis review is not whether Texas should be concerned about opposite-sex sodomy, but whether it is reasonable to believe that same-sex sodomy is a distinct public health problem.

[Consort]

He just has to learn how do it more effectively.

[11th Earl of Mar]

If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to ... adultery

Uh... people do have the right to commit adultery.

ALthough I support Rick Santorum, I don't know why he would pick this comparison.

[alloysteel]

Yeah, what Rick Santorum said. Some things just are not morally equivalent to others. There are only a few right ways in life, but an enormous number of wrong ways.

To those who protest that they have a "right" to their beliefs - Believe, but abstain. Just don't burden us with your bad behavior.

[RJCogburn]

"Putting homosexuality on the same moral plane as incest is repulsive," says the professional homosexual.

But Rick also put it on the same plane as adultery, meaning people like Hyde, Gingrich, Livingston....

Right?

[Doc Savage]

(Sarcasm On)

Gee,... heteros are always trying to make homo sex dirty and obscene. But just imagine it my way....Here you are in a filthy gay bath-house, on your hands and knees for the 15th time that night having anal sex with a guy you just met moments ago,...you've just taken your 35th hit of nitrite poppers and your nose is bleeding from 3 years of non-stop cocaine. You've got AIDS, syph, the clap, and you need 2 hits of viagra just to remember where your penis is. You're 42, you've wasted your life on homo sex, illegal drugs and medications to keep you alive, you have no family, no kids, no future except being an aging queen.

Now I think that paints a pretty good picture, don't you?

(Sarcasm off!)

[SevenDaysInMay]

Beware "compelling State interest".

Santorem said ~'we have rights' = meaning government's rights: WRONG. Government has limited powers enumerated under our Constitutions, federal and the several states - We the People have rights, highlighted by our Bill of Rights, especially the ignored 9th and 10th Amendments which gave rise to Privacy. The rights reserved to the people and the several states must be beyond the governments' limited powers.

The Right to Privacy was not created as bad law, but another God-given right finally recognized by the SCOTUS while they made the grave mistake of granting gravid women the sole power to kill their unborn children.

Equal protection of the 14th Amendment is tested again. Oh bugger. Is what's good for the gander's goose to be good for two geese?

Setting the prostate pals's copulation desires aside for the moment, just when is the State, under penalty of law, allowed to investigate and prosecute consenting adults for actions affecting no one else while in the privacy of one's own home?

This is a fundamental issue to be debated. What ever happended to "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness"? That never made its way into our Constitution.

For the record, I personally believe that homosexuality is a combination of defective genes and chosen deviant behavior. The lonely often veer into dead ends.

[lawdude]

""It is stunning, stunning in its insensitivity," David Smith told the Philadelphia Inquirer. "Putting homosexuality on the same moral plane as incest is repulsive.""

But the Court ruling may just be taken to put them on the same level in the legal arena.

Why is it ok to be 'insensitive' to Christians but no other "group"? Of course, by asking the question I may seem to be agreeing that his comments WERE insensitive, which I do not.

[Bullish]

Now, let's grab the nettle:

Uh, isn't that what gets homos in trouble in the first place?

[B Knotts]

Seems like a good time to bump this thread.

In light of this, that is:

Utah Polygamist Invokes Ruling on Gay Sex