Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: capt. norm
In the Wal-Mart example: If you've ever taken an item back to Wal-Mart, then you know what I mean. They don't care what, if anything, is wrong with the product, if you don't like the item for whatever reason,it's refund time. I would imagine that they have enough clout with their suppliers to get the manufacturer to take it back from them.

There's a flip side to that however. As good as WalMart is in regards to customer service/relations they run roughshod over their suppliers. The suppliers are caught in a bind because of WalMart's market share.

13 posted on 04/26/2003 6:29:18 AM PDT by Archangelsk (Economy for the simple minded. You cain't spend what you ain't gots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Archangelsk
As good as WalMart is in regards to customer service/relations they run roughshod over their suppliers. The suppliers are caught in a bind because of WalMart's market share.

Are you kidding? If suppliers feel abused by Wal-Mart, they don't have to sell to them. (Yeah, right!)

What supplier is caught in a bind because of Wal-Mart? If anything, Wal-Mart makes suppliers more efficient by forcing them to squeeze costs out of their structure to meet WM's price demands.

It's all good for consumers, which is Wal-Mart's bottom line.

17 posted on 04/26/2003 6:33:53 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson