Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Note the CVS officials' logic here: the co-workers life was not in danger until the pharmacist (not the robber) had possession of the weapon.
1 posted on 04/25/2003 9:24:15 PM PDT by azturk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: azturk
Good post. This is a shocking story that has lots of people here (in Indiana) talking. It seems that CVS is very wrong.
2 posted on 04/25/2003 9:26:21 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: azturk; glock rocks; B4Ranch
Well this says alot about "big" chain stores. I used to get stuff/medicines at the CVS. But since this..To heck with'em I'll go somewhere else.
4 posted on 04/25/2003 9:49:26 PM PDT by Madcelt (the right of self defence is an inherent and inalienable right -except for CVS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: azturk
I will no longer do any business with CVS. They were wrong to fire the pharmacist for doing what anyone would do when their life was threatened.
5 posted on 04/25/2003 9:51:48 PM PDT by rllngrk33 (Being a liberal means never admitting you're wrong, even in the face of facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: azturk
Yup. If the pharmacist and his co-worker had been murdered, CVS' officials would have had no problem living with the outcome. Its just self-defense with a gun on the part of an employee they find intolerable. <sarcasm.
6 posted on 04/25/2003 9:54:11 PM PDT by goldstategop ( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *bang_list
Bump!
7 posted on 04/25/2003 9:54:13 PM PDT by Fixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cuttnhorse
ping
10 posted on 04/25/2003 10:14:25 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: azturk
Shoot them while they're FACING you.
11 posted on 04/25/2003 10:55:48 PM PDT by jimkress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: azturk
It's good he didn't do it in New York.

He'd have been arrested for the following charges:

Discharging a firearm within 500' of a building.
Possession of an illegal handgun.
Possession of an unregistered handgun.
Possession of stolen property.
Assault with a deadly weapon.
Intimidation.

Sure, he could us a gun in self-defense, just not *that* gun, and not after he'd disarmed the criminal/attempted murderer or rapist (or both).
13 posted on 04/26/2003 8:03:27 AM PDT by Maelstrom (To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson