Skip to comments.
Jail term won't alter juror's defiant attitude [amazing stupidity]
Grand Rapids Press ^
| Friday, April 25, 2003
| Barton Deiters and Doug Guthrie
Posted on 04/25/2003 6:36:04 PM PDT by FourPeas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-203 next last
To: friendly
I'm not saying that this guy should have had to pull jury duty. Obviously, he should and could have been exempted. They weren't asking him to kowtow before the judge and beg for mercy. If he could have mustered 2 minutes of self control, he wouldn't be in jail.
Like the example I stated earlier about the cop; just because you are in the right doesn't mean you can curse out the law enforcement/judiciary for bothering you. No one asked him to kneel and kiss their pinky ring, they were just doing their jobs in a straightforward, professional manner. He reacted like he was speaking to someone at the bar who spilled beer on him on purpose.
If a cop pulls someone over for a traffic violation they don't think they did, do you think that they should be able to tell him to screw off and drive away? Would that make this a better country?
21
posted on
04/25/2003 7:24:07 PM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(Like water in a bucket.... calm but deadly...)
To: OldEagle
I think the judge was right. There are legitimate excuses from jury duty. A jury trial is one of the corner stones of our legal system.Of course the judge was right.
Since the end of the draft, I think jury service is the only time that our government demands a citizen's personal services. But, for some people even that is apparently too much to ask.
To: friendly
Brian Scott Lett is not the shiniest penny in the mint. But this poor shlub he has no car, takes a cab, has to care for his 1-year-old daughter, and cannot afford to miss time at his maintenance job. All this guy had to do was call the Clerk of the Court and explain his situation. Arrangements would almost certainly have been made. This person strikes me as an insecure smartass, hypersensitive about any perceived injury to his precious "rights" -- the kind of pinched-faced loser who installs a remote-switched headlamp on the back of his pickup truck to "teach tailgaters to stay offa mah aiyuss."
Persons of that sort are the inevitable product of a culture that worships Liberty instead of Duty.
23
posted on
04/25/2003 7:28:16 PM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: friendly
So, I guess you are unfamiliar with the jury system. One of the first questions asked is if there is any reason that you should be excused.
Citizen Juries are the cornerstone of the American Justice System. Without Citizen Juries we become French.
Jury duty is not voluntary. It is an obligation that all citizens have, just because they are citizens. Every jury in the land is composed of citizens who were called on to do their duty to justice.
What is your problem?
24
posted on
04/25/2003 8:04:58 PM PDT
by
jimtorr
To: jimtorr
Juries are treated like dirt, lead and molded in their opinion by corrupt judges and lawyers, and grossly overused. The lawyer industry has flooded the courts with fake civil cases, only to make vast fortunes for the shysters. The courts have failed and jury duty has a lot to do with this.
Do you really think that a carefully crafted group of trailer trash and urban welfare morons should decide the complexities of a bogus multi-billion class action suit, where the plaintiff lawyers make vast fortunes and the alleged plaintiffs get worthless coupons?
And the final summary of modern juries: "OJ"
25
posted on
04/25/2003 8:13:34 PM PDT
by
friendly
To: FourPeas
AND you get free donuts!
Well... here anyway!
MMMmmmmm.......donuts! Aaaaaaaghhhhhhhh!
Tia
26
posted on
04/25/2003 8:14:38 PM PDT
by
tiamat
("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
To: jimtorr
"What is your problem?"
Probably that for many people, myself included, the idea of being asked to show up and sit around all day while the trial lawyers try to find the "right" mix of people is an insult. I would gladly serve on a jury if I knew that there would be no "voir dire" to exclude jurors with an iota of common sense.
I shredded my last jury summons, and never heard from the court. They can't prove that you got it unless they sent it registered mail. Mail theft is a big problem in some cities, you know.
To: Henrietta
Probably that for many people, myself included, the idea of being asked to show up and sit around all day while the trial lawyers try to find the "right" mix of people is an insult. I would gladly serve on a jury if I knew that there would be no "voir dire" to exclude jurors with an iota of common sense. Finally, someone with common sense! Thank you Henrietta.
28
posted on
04/25/2003 8:16:50 PM PDT
by
friendly
To: Beelzebubba
GOOD FOR THE JUDGE.
The joker's attitude is like
her unroyal lowness,
her hideous heinous--
Bwitch Shrillery--who
wouldn't stoop to such a little people duty.
Jury duty is almost a sacred honor in our system of government and justice. His attitude and behavior are inexcusable.
He should have thought of his year old daughter before acting out and mouthing off. He sounds like an accident waiting to happen anyway.
29
posted on
04/25/2003 8:19:28 PM PDT
by
Quix
To: Steel Wolf
"If he could have mustered 2 minutes of self control, he wouldn't be in jail."
You mean, if he could have mustered 8 hours of time away from his productive job supporting his family, to tell a "civil servant" judge what he needed to hear to compensate for the judge's own self esteem deficiencies (in comparison to his competent law school colleagues who are earning triple his salary, voluntarily paid), he wouldn't have been sentenced by that judge?
30
posted on
04/25/2003 8:19:45 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
("Democracy, whiskey! And sexy!")
To: Scenic Sounds
"Since the end of the draft, I think jury service is the only time that our government demands a citizen's personal services. But, for some people even that is apparently too much to ask."
Please explain the moral distinction between the draft, jury "duty" and slavery. (Other than who is the slavemaster.)
31
posted on
04/25/2003 8:21:15 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
("Democracy, whiskey! And sexy!")
To: B-Chan
"All this guy had to do was call the Clerk of the Court and explain his situation. Arrangements would almost certainly have been made."
Kunta Kinte did fine when he played up to the "Massa" as well!
Suck up to your local tyrants! It's the American Way!(R)
32
posted on
04/25/2003 8:22:36 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
("Democracy, whiskey! And sexy!")
To: jimtorr
How is a "Citizen Jury"(R) incompatible with voluntary service?
33
posted on
04/25/2003 8:23:32 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
("Democracy, whiskey! And sexy!")
To: Henrietta
I shredded my last jury summons, too! Since they didn't send it by registered mail (the lazy, cheap bastards!), they can't prove I received it!
(I don't have a contempt for society, I have a contempt for government!)
34
posted on
04/25/2003 8:25:44 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
("Democracy, whiskey! And sexy!")
To: Beelzebubba
Please explain the moral distinction between the draft, jury "duty" and slavery. (Other than who is the slavemaster.)I've served as a juror, but I wasn't drafted and I've never been a slave so I can't personally help you much with the differences. However, I suspect that if you ever do get a chance to ask a slave, they'll probably be able to tell you about plenty of differences. ;-)
To: Quix
"Jury duty is almost a sacred honor in our system of government and justice."
How many tens of thousand of dollars of your family's financial security are you willing to sacrifice on the altar of our corrupt judicial system?
36
posted on
04/25/2003 8:27:20 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
("Democracy, whiskey! And sexy!")
To: Beelzebubba
Hunting Rules for Lawyers
This years Lawyer Season and Bag Limit regulations:
1. It shall be unlawful to shout "whiplash", "ambulance", or "free scotch" for the purpose of trapping lawyers.
2. It shall be unlawful to hunt lawyers within 50 yards of Micro$oft buildings.
It shall be unlawful to hunt lawyers within 100 yards of BMW, SAAB or Mercedes dealerships.
It also shall be unlawful to hunt lawyers within 200 yards of courtrooms, law libraries, health spas, ambulances or hospitals.
3. It shall be unlawful to use $100 bills, prostitutes, software license agreements or vehicle accidents to attract lawyers.
4. It shall be unlawful to chase, herd or harvest lawyers from a snow mobile, helicopter or aircraft.
5. Killing lawyers with a vehicle is prohibited. If accidentally struck, remove dead lawyer to roadside and proceed to the nearest car wash.
6. Stuffed or mounted lawyers must have a state health department inspection sticker.
7. It shall be illegal for a hunter to disguise himself as a reporter, drug dealer, female legale cleark, Micro$oft employee, accident victim, bookie or tax accountant for the purpose of hunting lawyers.
8. Taking lawyers with traps or deadfalls is permitted. The use of currency as bait is prohibited.
9. Varios bag limits are set for lawyers including:
Brown-nosed judge kissers...............2
Back-stabbing divorce litigators........4
Hairy-chinned civil libertarians........7
Two-faced tort chaser...................2
Micro$oft legal department member.......9
Yellow bellied sidewinders..............2
10.Note that honest lawyers are extinct.
37
posted on
04/25/2003 8:31:29 PM PDT
by
friendly
To: Scenic Sounds
Since the end of the draft, I think jury service is the only time that our government demands a citizen's personal services. But, for some people even that is apparently too much to ask.What about all the taxes and regulations there are on the citizens? We're already serfs at this point.
38
posted on
04/25/2003 8:31:58 PM PDT
by
Hoppean
To: Beelzebubba
No, I mean that if he had followed that pesky Constitution thingy and showed up for jury duty, and not cursed out a public official for no reason whatsoever, he could have put in for his exemption and gone home. Sure, he would have had to miss a couple hours of work, and spring for a ride to the courthouse and back.
What is astounding is that allegedly patriotic and civic minded Americans see this as so unreasonable. There isn't so much as a hint of any wrongdoing on the part of the civil servants; they just asked him to show up as required by law.
You might not like the IRS, and think that they have been unfairly taking your hard earned money. Does that mean you can call them up and say '(explative) you, I'm not paying my taxes, bitch'. No, you can't. You could make as many ad hominem attacks against IRS agents you like, but you'd be on the wrong side of the law.
39
posted on
04/25/2003 8:32:27 PM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(Like water in a bucket.... calm but deadly...)
To: Beelzebubba
I got a chuckle out of your attempts to gain attention by being outrageous. But you know, you sound like a Bakunin leftist. Perhaps you would be happier hanging out at a different web site?
40
posted on
04/25/2003 8:33:55 PM PDT
by
Iris7
(Sufficient for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-203 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson