To: MadIvan
And Hollywood darling and leftist Presidential candidate Harry Dean says that he "is not sure if the Iraqi people are better off without Saddam."
6 posted on
04/25/2003 2:49:35 PM PDT by
demnomo
To: demnomo
Get the testimony of these poor people, the videos of the torture cells and a loaded revolver. Point loaded revolver at the back of Dean's head to force him to watch and read. If he does not recant...well then you know that he is an evil man.
Regards, Ivan
7 posted on
04/25/2003 2:51:46 PM PDT by
MadIvan
To: demnomo
Howard Dean can't admit the Iraqis are better off, or the farce of his "humanitarian" objection to the war would be obvious (how can he be against a war for humanitarian reasons if it produces a better humanitarian situation?)
8 posted on
04/25/2003 2:52:33 PM PDT by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: demnomo
Is Mr. Dean on, say, crack? This is as bad as the NYTimes article yesterday.
13 posted on
04/25/2003 2:58:33 PM PDT by
Jaded
(Close the BORDERS and the CHECKBOOK!! (schpelin iz opshenul))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson