Zot admits it supported a previous lying president

ABC News.com ^ | 4/25/03 | John Cochran

[Feiny]

Never Mind!

[11th Earl of Mar]

Maybe Saddam will run on the democrat ticket in 2004?

I'm sure he has more life than Al Gore.

[Loyalist]

Your namesake was a holier man than any of us here. He could also whoop you before you could say Syllabus of Errors.

[clintonh8r]

What's that on your chin....clinton DNA?

[Dead Corpse]

You liked that one hunh? How about this one...

[annyokie]

[amused]

What's up with the "sleepers"?

Are they really old sign up accounts or have some enterprising trolls found a way to fake an older screenname?

The latter though annoying is not nearly as disturbing as the former. To wait 2 years????????

[weegee]

My president told me that we were going to go after countries that sponsored and harbored terrorists. Saddam Hussein fit both counts.

He violated the 1991 "peace" agreements with his efforts to continue arming. Consider him like a felon out on parole who keeps trying to (and sometimes succeeding) in buying guns.

Saddam even refused to permit people who had search warrants to search his residences. Whether a WMD is located or not does not make or break the case for the effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power (he was offered the opportunity to leave power without a war).

This crap will get dredged up by the left just as they continue to spout their lies about the 2000 election.

[SquirrelKing]

...pinheads...

So, zotboy, how many angels can dance on your head?

[GodBlessRonaldReagan]

I want the Punk Kitties!

A fellow Punk Kittens fan! Don't get me wrong, the Viking Kitties are way cool, but PUNK KITTENS RULE, OK?

[Weimdog]

The link to ABC News article does not quote one named White House official.

[george wythe]

ABCnews "Nightline:"

TED KOPPEL: If indeed it turns out that the weapons either did not exist or were destroyed before the war began, should there be a trace of embarrassment? Or does the new justification serve anyway?

JAMES WOOLSEY: Not at all. I think there will be evidence that there were substantial biological and chemical weapons stocks, some after '98 and before the war. And exactly when they were destroyed, possibly right at the beginning of the war, I think shouldn't affect this at all. I think that it is, I think the Administration deserves credit in this for being pretty careful about what they said. And the Secretary of State's presentation before the Security Council was a careful presentation. If the Iraqis destroyed much of that in the opening days of the war, so be it. We'll find some evidence to that effect.

[Samwise]

I would like to know how many people signed up between the 2000 election and the Inauguration, with the intent of causing trouble later on.

I dunno. I certainly lost count of the many personalities and manifestations of Al Gore.

[ido_now]

Unfortunately you are correct and therefore it is anything but funny.

[cksharks]

Hmmmm I sorta remember that name. LOL

[Miss Marple]

Second wave of sleepers?

[Conservative4Ever]

Viking Kittens....all hail....they are our overlords....

Red

[aught-6]

Explain the ZOT

I see that you have received your answer already.

[Jay D. Dyson]

Fat, drunk and zotted is no way to go through life, son...

[lainie]

You'll notice ABC didn't "name" any sources...

It's interesting -- they print this stuff thinking they'll rile the masses, when the reality is that it just kinda sits there. Libs already think this pulp is true and the rest of us have our suspicions about ABC News confirmed once again.