Skip to comments.
Judge: File-swapping tools are legal !!!!
CNET ^
| 4/25/2004
| John Borland
Posted on 04/25/2003 11:59:07 AM PDT by ArcLight
A federal judge in Los Angeles has handed a stunning court victory to file-swapping services Streamcast Networks and Grokster, dismissing much of the record industry and movie studios' lawsuit against the two companies. In an almost complete reversal of previous victories for the record labels and movie studios, federal court Judge Stephen Wilson ruled that Streamcast--parent of the Morpheus software--and Grokster were not liable for copyright infringements that took place using their software. The ruling does not directly affect Kazaa, software distributed by Sharman Networks, which has also been targeted by the entertainment industry.
"Defendants distribute and support software, the users of which can and do choose to employ it for both lawful and unlawful ends," Wilson wrote in his opinion, released Friday. "Grokster and Streamcast are not significantly different from companies that sell home video recorders or copy machines, both of which can be and are used to infringe copyrights."
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: grokster; morpheus; peertopeer; techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-264 next last
To: The Old Hoosier
Well, that means you can kiss the recording industry--and rock music--goodbye permanently. I really think that the current situation is much inferior to what we might get should things open up. There are lots of bands that are very good, yet they get very little publicity or income because the big companies promote a handful of groups that are part of the "in" crowd.
What will happen is that music will have to earn its way by live concerts. They can't sing one tune in a recording studio, and make money off that work for decades. They'll have to work every day to make a living, just like the rest of us.
Besides, the original intent of copyright laws was to allow a right to publish for a limited amount of time. I think that's right in the Constitution. And yet these people have successfully lobbied the congress to set that "limited time" to virtually forever. It's an abuse of the copyright principle in the Constitution.
21
posted on
04/25/2003 12:09:07 PM PDT
by
narby
(Fox News = America's News Network)
To: mitchbert
Ugh.
remeber = remember. Preview twice, post once...
22
posted on
04/25/2003 12:09:19 PM PDT
by
mitchbert
(Facts are Stubborn Things)
To: narby
The technical problem would exist even if copyrights lasted but one year.
To: ArcLight
I think I'll go download Beethoven's Ninth Symphony!
24
posted on
04/25/2003 12:10:14 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: ArcLight
A happy GNU day!!!!
To: mitchbert
So the Betamax decision has survived the new copyright law! Very interesting.
To: The Old Hoosier
Oh really. There have been massive changes in the home recording industry over the last 5 years. One still cannot get the quality of a real studio recording at home unless you're willing to buy $5,000 limiters for each channel but its getting closer and closer to the 'pretend' studio point where its getting harder for a layman to tell the difference. Kids already can't really tell the difference between an .mp3 and a .wav file anyway. The recording industry will still exist as do $50,000 grand pianos but the home studios (and sampled keyboards) continue to make big inroads. Kids no longer want to buy whole CDs. They want the ability to string together individual songs from a 100 bands. As you can see on mp3.com, there are thousands of artists now, many of whom record at home studios. There will be smaller pool of the big acts and huge numbers of half-arsed acts. The pyranmid is flattening. It's getting more dispersed and less concentrated. I don't feel sorry for the musicians, most are stupid liberals anyway.
To: The Old Hoosier
Well, that means you can kiss the recording industry--and rock music--goodbye permanently.Ba-bye.
28
posted on
04/25/2003 12:13:19 PM PDT
by
Stentor
To: mitchbert
Well, looks like the court nailed it. Not bad...not bad at all.
29
posted on
04/25/2003 12:13:56 PM PDT
by
July 4th
To: mitchbert
So the Betamax decision [MIGHT] survive the new copyright law... [duh]
What are the chances that Congress "fixes" this???
To: ArcLight
Finally, a common sense ruling. It is about time.
31
posted on
04/25/2003 12:14:21 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: narby
the original intent of copyright laws was to allow a right to publish for a limited amount of time. Yes, but think about it: the very minute my band publishes a song, I no longer can charge anyone for it, because it is already FREE on the internet. So who can make a living writing or playing music?
If the drug industry had this kind of paradigm, no one would ever get well.
To: The Old Hoosier
Well, that means you can kiss the recording industry--and rock music--goodbye permanently. Surely you joke.
33
posted on
04/25/2003 12:15:09 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: seamole
Seamole, you a fool...LOL!! :-)
34
posted on
04/25/2003 12:16:53 PM PDT
by
ArcLight
To: Frumious Bandersnatch
And cassettes, too. Remember "Home recording is killing music" ? That was c.1983.
35
posted on
04/25/2003 12:17:07 PM PDT
by
kaylar
To: nina0113; plain talk
Now the culture is used to getting songs for free, and it's way too late to put THAT genie back in the bottle. I disagree. It's a matter of simple economics that no one pays for what they can get for free.
As soon as artists stop writing songs--the logical economic conclusion of this ruling--then people will not be used to getting them for free any more.
Read my lips: no new music.
To: ArcLight
Tools are legal, illegal use is not.
Guns are legal, murder is not.
Simple..
37
posted on
04/25/2003 12:19:23 PM PDT
by
a_Turk
(Lookout, lookout, the candy man..)
To: The Old Hoosier
The Old Hoosier wrote:
Well, that means you can kiss the recording industry--and rock music--goodbye permanently.
Rifleman Replies:
Then there is no down side at all!
38
posted on
04/25/2003 12:20:03 PM PDT
by
Rifleman
To: The Old Hoosier
It's not already free.
Those who bootleg can still be prosecuted.
39
posted on
04/25/2003 12:20:05 PM PDT
by
William McKinley
(You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
To: smith288
Whatever happened to those "artists" who always say "I do it for the looooove, maaaan". They got busted....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-264 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson