Obviously not necessary to convict by the jury of their peers. Multiple trials, different jurors, unanimous verdicts, appeals process ... I guess they're all corrupt.
Why are they just picking on Coleman? Sounds like you think they should lock up everyone involved (whites only, goes w/o saying).
Why are they just picking on Coleman? Sounds like you think they should lock up everyone involved
I'm against jailing jurors for stupid verdicts; I don't suspect corruption on their part. The prosecutors should perhaps be investigated, though.
(whites only, goes w/o saying).
Not in my book.