To: Mo1
So you think it was wrong for Blair to stand by us during the war with Iraq .. was it wrong of Blair to send British troops to help and support our military?
...
Yes and no.
It was great of him to send troops and stand with us against Iraq.
but,,,,
He was not needed and wasted at least 6 months. The war could of been over last October if it wasn't for Blair and Clinton. And we could of done it without him and his troops.
454 posted on
04/25/2003 8:32:44 PM PDT by
TLBSHOW
(The gift is to see the truth.....)
To: TLBSHOW
Oh for Pete's sake. Now stop that.
458 posted on
04/25/2003 8:35:01 PM PDT by
Brad’s Gramma
(Become a Monthly Donor to Free Republic. Please?)
To: TLBSHOW
Yes and no.
It was great of him to send troops and stand with us against Iraq.
but,,,,
He was not needed and wasted at least 6 months. The war could of been over last October if it wasn't for Blair and Clinton. And we could of done it without him and his troops. BUT .. what happen to that bottom line
And I disagee, He and the British troops were needed as were all the other countries that helped us during this war and they ALL deserve credit for putting their butts on the line to do the right thing
As for dealing with this in October, obviously you know nothing about planning a war
I am far from any kind of expert and I even know you need troops and equipment to win a war .. and it takes time to building this up
Or do you think we should just send our troops in without backup?
486 posted on
04/25/2003 8:50:18 PM PDT by
Mo1
(I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson