BLAIR'S SECRET WAR MEETINGS WITH CLINTON

The Drudge Report ^ | 4/24/03

[rockinonritalin]

BLAIR'S SECRET WAR MEETINGS WITH CLINTON... Tony Blair took repeated secret advice from Bill Clinton on how to unlock the diplomatic impasse between Europe and the US in the build-up to the war... DEVELOPING...

[Howlin]

Hmmm.......are you a socialist? We need a socialist for our treasurer, to help us cheat "the people," of course.

[woofie]

Im an Episcopalian but they can do anything they want...Lets get a second mortgage on the clubhouse... We can blow the money on a trip to see Tony Blair

[Brad’s Gramma]

I was just kidding.

[Fred Mertz]

Are they trying to pick on you again, TLB?

[justshe]

I used to like you. Thought you were a solid GOP conservative. But you sure went off your meds. You wouldn't recognize a 'smear' if it slapped you up side your head. At least YOUR smears are finally seeing the light of day.

---

I will never be a blinded follower of Bush or the republican party EVER.........any party that brings in the patriot Act and bans guns and thinks a socialist CLINTON LOVER(BLAIR) and a commie (PUTIN) is good is never to be trusted in my book.<1>

[Mo1]

Yes and no.
It was great of him to send troops and stand with us against Iraq.
but,,,,
He was not needed and wasted at least 6 months. The war could of been over last October if it wasn't for Blair and Clinton. And we could of done it without him and his troops.

BUT .. what happen to that bottom line

And I disagee, He and the British troops were needed as were all the other countries that helped us during this war and they ALL deserve credit for putting their butts on the line to do the right thing

As for dealing with this in October, obviously you know nothing about planning a war

I am far from any kind of expert and I even know you need troops and equipment to win a war .. and it takes time to building this up

Or do you think we should just send our troops in without backup?

[TLBSHOW]

You do know Howlin wasn't originally a Islam defender. She only became one after she was given her marching orders. She was very hateful of Islam until then and her posts were as mean about it as she is to me now. Really funny how she did a 180 when The President and Powell bashed Pat Robertson.

No wonder the two of you get along well you both have smearing and the 180 turns now pat.

[Libloather]

...underlining the extent to which Mr Blair rates Mr Clinton's analytical powers...

The impeached *Squirt wants the head UN job. (Wanted to say - UN head job, but...)

Ya think he knew about Saddam's corruption and the oil money laundering? Oh, yeah...

[justshe]

180 turn? Please point out any 180 turns I have done. And be specific.

[Howlin]

There is one other requirement: you have to believe that Ronald Reagan signed a secret deal in 1985 with Gorbachev to merge the school systems of the United States and the Soviet Union.

[Howlin]

Post any post that where I have defended fanatical Muslims.

[woofie]

I thought it was 86

[TLBSHOW]

TLB has been one of the few Freepers that has been calling it like it truly is whether some of you like it or not. I did my share of TLB bashing and then apologized to TLB. I agree with him on Blair, Putin, and now I have to admit that he was right about not allowing Lott to be taken out as much as I didn't like Lott as Majority Leader.


snip

Pretty bad on here when Freepers are afraid to start a flame war or get trashed if they speak up when they have something they disagree with. I will continue to speak out when I think something is wrong and I will work as hard to get the President re-elected in 2004 as I did in the 2000 election which started in January 1999.

.....

Thanks and don't stop speaking out, you are doing the right thing. Can you say landslide 2004?

[Howlin]

You'll have to ask Todd to find out the truth; that's his claim.

[Howlin]

Of course he did.

[Mo1]

You do know Howlin wasn't originally a Islam defender. She only became one after she was given her marching orders.

Her Marching orders??

But but I thought Howlin was the leader of the gang?

[Howlin]

It's all very confusing.

I guess if you don't have any principles of your own, and you have to cut and paste other people's words, you'd have to believe everybody else does the same thing.

[justshe]

I'm going to 'bold' some of Jim's statement that I think is very applicable to this thread. This was a post Jim made about the 'gun grabbing' President Bush was accused of: HERE

---

"My opinion is that it looks like a whole lot of people are blowing a piece of leftist anti-Bush propaganda (published, by the socialist/marxist Washington Post, no less) all out of proportion. Looks like a whole lot of anti-Republicans are gleefully jumping onto the Washington Post's leftist Bush bashing bandwagon. My advice to those who are so happy to bash Bush and the Republicans ought to be very careful who they go to bed with. Destroy the momentum currently building for one of the very rare conservative led governments in all of U.S. history and they're liable to wake up with a real gun-grabbing socialist whore, ahem, as in Hillary Clinton, in the White House.

No wonder conservatives can't make any real headway in government. As soon as the momentum starts building, out come the hand-wringing doom and gloom naysayers, for whom no conservative is good enough, to smear and destroy any and all progress made to date by the Republicans, and by doing so, reinstalling the leftist liberals to their socialist government command posts.

And the downward spiral to socialist hell spins on.

Time to break the cycle by not surrendering to the left or to the well-meaning, but misguided right-wing naysayers. Continue the Republican conservative revolution. Dump the RATS!

BTW, it's a real laugher when right-wingers start allying themselves with known leftists (International Answer, for example) and then have the audacity to accuse conservative FReepers of being "statists." Many of these same "right-wing conservatives" (probably mostly Buchanites or self-labeled so-called "paleocons") have openly allied themselves with the marxists, communists, anarchists, and other anti-war Hollywood type leftists against Bush, against defending America, against defending freedom, and against Republicanism in general. FReepers are statists for backing Bush? Yeah, right. By that same logic, that would make Buchanan and his paleocon followers marxists, or in the very least, useful idiots, for supporting the Washington Post and the real unAmerican, freedom hating Hollywood anti-war gun-grabbing left, et al.

"We have met the enemy and he are us." The paleocons are fond of using this Pogoism as applied to mainstream conservatives, but, in many cases, I'd say the finger points right back at them. The anti-Republican conservatives seem to be the enemy of sustained conservative government.

I'm a liberty minded individual who backs the Constitution and the Bill of Rights 100%, but there is no way that I'm going to dump Bush or dump the Republican majority. Not now. Not ever. The momentum is building and will continue to build. If we want to remove liberalism and socialism from our government and restore constitutional limits, etc., then, IMHO, we cannot possibly allow the Democrats to regain control. Reelecting president Bush, and gaining larger majorities in the House, the Senate, and the Judiciary and also in state and local governments is a must if we are ever to retake America and our Liberty. This is my goal for the coming election cycle and beyond.

Naysayers be damned. Full speed ahead!"

1,168 posted on 04/17/2003 2:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

[Fred Mertz]

I guess if you don't have any principles of your own...

What are you trying to say?

[Brad’s Gramma]

And that is why he, and non of us, runs this show.

Jim, I'm mighty proud of you.