Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homicide Leading Cause of Death in Women With Child (pregnant women)
ABC ^ | Ephrat Livni

Posted on 04/24/2003 4:49:09 PM PDT by hotpotato

The doctors did DNA testing to determine if the condition was genetic. They also quizzed Chong on what drugs she had taken during her pregnancy, but discovered nothing that could explain the baby's condition, called dislocated bilateral radial head of the right arm.

Eventually, physicians determined the condition occurred in utero and asked Chong if she'd had any accidents during the pregnancy. The mother considered the question carefully — no, none. But there had been kicking and stomping.

Chong, now 38, survived her husbands' beatings, but many women do not.

Black and Blue Before Birth

According to a new study in the Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, homicide is the leading cause of death among pregnant women in the United States. Because of the way deaths are reported in this country, however, the link between homicide and pregnancy often goes unremarked, prompting the American College of Nurse-Midwives to call violent death during pregnancy, "a hidden epidemic."

"What pregnant women do not know," says the organization's director Deanne Williams, "is that instead of facing joyful celebration at the announcement of pregnancy, too many face violent death. We have got to do a better job of identifying this problem and helping the women and their partners not end up with such a horrific outcome."

Researchers reviewed 651 women's autopsy charts from the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in the District of Columbia between 1988 and 1996, and found 13 pregnancies among the homicides. During that same period, the D.C. State Center for Health Statistics reported only 21 maternal deaths, all from medical causes, such as hemorrhaging and infection.

But 13 homicides of pregnant women were not reported as maternal deaths. When included in the maternal death data, pregnancy-associated homicides account for 38 percent of the total, according to the study's authors.

"It's not routine for evidence of pregnancy to be recorded on death certificates," says Dr. Clara Krulewitch, a nurse/midwife and epidimiologist at the University of Maryland in Baltimore and the lead author of the study. Because of death coding standards, collecting accurate data on homicide as a cause of maternal mortality is very difficult, she explains.

In addition, FBI statistics don't note if a woman was pregnant at the time of a homicide, allowing many violent deaths associated with pregnancy to escape scrutiny. "We need to rethink how we measure and collect the data," says Krulewitch.

Building a Body of Evidence

In fact, Washington D.C. and Maryland, have recently adopted policies of recording pregnancy on death certificates. The World Health Organization has also begun collecting data on the link between homicide and pregnancy.

Krulewitch and her team hope that on the basis of their data and others' now being collected, routine screening for domestic violence during pregnancy will soon be implemented. Without a body of evidence, however, it is impossible to get funding for screening, support and prevention programs. "Once we quantify the problem, we can start to deal with contextual issues," she says.

The study also found that younger women were at greater risk of death during pregnancy, with teenagers in the highest risk category. Chong — a former federal police officer who killed her husband in a violent struggle after he closed a car door on her stomach during a third pregnancy in 1993 — is now devoting her life to teaching those young women about the violence they may encounter.

She points to her own life story and the shooting of former NFL player Rae Carruth's pregnant girlfriend as examples, saying some men believe it's easier to get rid of the baby and the woman than to deal with child support.

Like Krulewitch, Chong thinks screening for domestic violence during pregnancy is critical. Her daughter, now a teenager, has had difficulties learning and her right arm is set at a permanent ninety degree angle. "Everyone believes in human rights and there's a lot of talk about the rights of the unborn child, but what are we doing to protect her," she asks.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homicide; murder; pregnancy; pregnat
Another more in-depth article from Salon with some explanations:

Homicide thought no. 1 cause of death during pregnancy

1 posted on 04/24/2003 4:49:09 PM PDT by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
The "Constitution" says that abortion is a rational choice--indeed, a sacred "right" without which we would be living in a Taliban theocracy. Therefore, when a woman refuses to be rational and intelligent, and exercise that sacred right, it is only natural that a father who does not want her to bear a child would become enraged, and exercise the same choice that the "Constitution" says the woman should be exercising.
2 posted on 04/24/2003 5:26:24 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
So I take it you think Scott Peterson should walk.

What a lame and unsympathetic response to a sad reality.
3 posted on 04/24/2003 6:36:11 PM PDT by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
IMO, it's stretching/creating a statistic to fit an agenda. Much like the one afew years ago about the surge in abuse against women on Superbowl Sunday.

Chances are the men who beat their wives/girlfriends during pregnancy, probably beat them when they are not pregnant. It's still wrong.
4 posted on 04/24/2003 7:23:04 PM PDT by Jaded (Close the BORDERS and the CHECKBOOK!! (schpelin iz opshenul))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
uhmmm... what agenda? Chances are the men who beat their wives/girlfriends during pregnancy, probably beat them when they are not pregnant. It's still wrong.

I don't think those reporting on this would disagree. I believe what they want to do is make the public aware and look for answers and more importantly, solutions. In the past, no data was kept on whether murdered women were pregnant or not. Now they are keeping the data which is necessary as in any research where one looks for solutions.

5 posted on 04/24/2003 9:02:03 PM PDT by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
If the state of California holds (and it does) that it would be legitimate for Laci Peterson to kill her baby, then the state has no logical basis for prosecuting Scott Peterson for killing both Laci and the baby.
6 posted on 04/25/2003 11:14:27 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
Makes me wonder why Laci Petersen is such a big national story then.
7 posted on 05/01/2003 10:16:26 AM PDT by iranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
I'm sorry I missed this last month. I hope more people see it now.

The violence against a woman actually changes when she becomes pregnant: the breasts, abdomen and genitalia are targeted. In other words, the baby is targeted.

In Texas, like Connecticutt and unlike California, there are no civil or criminal penalties for intentionally or negligently killing a child before birth against the mother's wishes.

If you're from Texas, please look at the information on HB 246 , the Prenatal Protection Act
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/899754/posts

We have a large majority of Representatives signed on, but Speaker Craddick doesn't want to anger the Texas Medical Association. The TMA is demanding Tort Reform, caps on jury awards in malpractice *and* that the unborn child remain a *no* *thing* in Texas. The TMA would rather protect a few bad doctors than stand up to the abusers and murderers of women and their children.
8 posted on 05/08/2003 11:30:21 AM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato
"What pregnant women do not know," says the organization's director Deanne Williams, "is that instead of facing joyful celebration at the announcement of pregnancy, too many face violent death. We have got to do a better job of identifying this problem and helping the women and their partners not end up with such a horrific outcome."

I wonder, from a purely evolutionary persepctive, if women aren't in more danger when the putative father is unsure of the unborn infant's paternity. It would be an interesting question to test. Certainly it is true that the rates of domestic violence have been going up in recent years.

9 posted on 05/08/2003 11:34:11 AM PDT by Under the Radar (Women's lib gave women the ability to pick up the check for their own abortions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
The statistic is significant in terms of public health, at least. A woman is more likely to die of homicide than the pregnancy.

And public awareness, and laws such as the Texas Prenatal Protection Act (if it's ever passed) would be one more tool to protect women from abusers, and to stop the abusers from hurting other women and children. There is evidence that men do react to the knowledge that they could go to jail for abuse, and I'll bet that they would be a little more careful where's it's specifically illegal to attack a woman who is pregnant in a way that kills the child.

The out of control men are already in jail, it's the men who use abuse to get their way and control women (or get rid of the "unwanted" child) that this information and the Texas HB 246 would affect.
10 posted on 05/08/2003 11:37:16 AM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson