Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RJCogburn
Similarly, can one appreciate objectivist thought and not be an atheist? Again, I would say, except for the most orthodox, the answer is yes.

Question from the audience at the Nathaniel Branden Institute circa 1965, a place where the word "God," pronounced aloud, provoked paroxysms of laughter, the only humor in and otherwise humorless lecture hall:

Audience Member: "Might not religious faith play a useful role in helping one endure tribulations?"
Rand: "What sort of inadequate and corrupt psychology would lead someone to ask that?"

Had Rand had children and stayed off pills, she might have experienced real human connection, enjoyed better mental health and therefore had something interesting to contribute to philosophy. As it is, her hopelessly stunted and paranoid worldview and unwarranted boundless faith in reason make her only a thinker of minor interest, not the "greatest philosopher since Aristotle" her cult followers make her out to be.

54 posted on 04/24/2003 6:49:18 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: beckett
As it is, her hopelessly stunted and paranoid worldview and unwarranted boundless faith in reason make her only a thinker of minor interest,

When assessing reality, what other tool would you recommend someone use other than reason?
79 posted on 04/25/2003 2:09:33 AM PDT by Rate_Determining_Step (US Military - Draining the Swamp of Terrorism since 2001!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson