[MHGinTN]

How very clintonesque of you, to assert that the Council is merely appointed to create a rubber stamp for the President's moral compass, then use as your 'proof' a repeat of your opinion that the Council is the rubber stamp for the President's moral direction. You are now so translucent, I won't bother responding to your shallowness further, in this 'RS' incarnation or the others you use at FR.

[RS]

"How very clintonesque of you, to assert that the Council is merely appointed to create a rubber stamp for the President's moral compass, then use as your 'proof' a repeat of your opinion that the Council is the rubber stamp for the President's moral direction."

First, I did not say that they were rubber stamps - simply that Bush or any politition would not, and should not appoint people to positions of power or advisement that oppose his moral standards.
It appears you disagree with this and feel that the President should appoint people that are at odds with his stated ideals and goals.
Hopefully, when Supreme Court appiontments come open he will follow my concepts, not yours.


"You are now so translucent, I won't bother responding to your shallowness further, in this 'RS' incarnation or the others you use at FR."

This is the most intriguing statement you have made !! Please tell me, who else am I ?