To: hocndoc
I'll get back to the other points, but I just wanted to note that the Bioethics Council has a point of view that they were selected to express.
I have no reason to believe that they would taint the facts of the scientific methodology, but from the ethics standpoint, they will come up with the results that are required of them.
148 posted on
05/01/2003 5:55:57 AM PDT by
RS
(nc)
To: RS
... but I just wanted to note that the Bioethics Council has a point of view that they were selected to express. Prove that assertion, oh omnipotent 'elder'.
149 posted on
05/01/2003 6:36:29 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: RS
That's not a valid argument in this case. Unlike the previous Bioethics Commission, this one has members who dissent from the viewpoint of the Chair.
If you read the reports, at least 3 of the members see nothing wrong with killing humans for their stem cells. However, the Council all agreed that the result of SCNT is the equivalent of a zygote and is a cloned human embryo.
156 posted on
05/01/2003 10:30:59 AM PDT by
hocndoc
(Choice is the # 1 killer in the US.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson