To: MadIvan
Yes, you're right - we have seen some really special effects from our troops these past few weeks.
However, if we do that (blow up their nuke plants), what's to stop N.K. from sending a nuke toward California - not that California doesn't need a little house cleaning - but that's a bit much!
I'm in California, so N.K. could be a real worry to me.
14 posted on
04/24/2003 4:53:00 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: CyberAnt
From what I've heard the Taep'o-dong 2 missiles have the range to hit Alaska. I've read a report where a part of one washed up on the Alaskan shoreline, but that doesn't sound like too successful a test to me. Also, Norad would have gone Ballistic if they would have detected a missile launch heading straight to Alaska. Some Taep'o-dong 3 missiles have been built but never been tested. Do you have any idea how hard it is to develop a working\reliable ICBM? Especially of the Taep'o-dong 3's supposed range. I think some of us are giving more credit to that missile than the NKs are. My feelings are we should take care of the problem soon. BEFORE they have a reliable weapon to reach the lower 48. We let them stew a few years, the problem's going to be worse...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson