Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MadIvan
Yes, you're right - we have seen some really special effects from our troops these past few weeks.

However, if we do that (blow up their nuke plants), what's to stop N.K. from sending a nuke toward California - not that California doesn't need a little house cleaning - but that's a bit much!

I'm in California, so N.K. could be a real worry to me.
14 posted on 04/24/2003 4:53:00 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: CyberAnt
From what I've heard the Taep'o-dong 2 missiles have the range to hit Alaska. I've read a report where a part of one washed up on the Alaskan shoreline, but that doesn't sound like too successful a test to me. Also, Norad would have gone Ballistic if they would have detected a missile launch heading straight to Alaska. Some Taep'o-dong 3 missiles have been built but never been tested. Do you have any idea how hard it is to develop a working\reliable ICBM? Especially of the Taep'o-dong 3's supposed range. I think some of us are giving more credit to that missile than the NKs are. My feelings are we should take care of the problem soon. BEFORE they have a reliable weapon to reach the lower 48. We let them stew a few years, the problem's going to be worse...
19 posted on 04/25/2003 5:51:49 AM PDT by Tomcat103
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson