Except in one case, you're talking about the termination of life in the womb and in this case you're talking about the duplication of genetic material from a human.
How is this subject beyond such terms? The anti-cloning people have no problem invoking scientific terminology to buttress or vary their arguments.
To address your question concerning taking tissue from an individual and 'cloning' an organ of/for that individual: Science may one day be able to reproduce a part of the whole organism, as in growing only a kidney that is a perfect tissue match for the individual from whom the genetic nuclear material is taken; that would be an embraceable medical miracle.
The moral societal issue is whether an individual human being is to be the source for the tissue, then the individual is discarded. As I tried to assert in my offering, the manipulations of diagnosis used with embryonic human beings attests to the reality that these embryos are indeed already individual humans, albethey sans a functioning higher brain.