Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cedric
I agree, but a public statement like that would just dominate the news cycle until Friday when the magazines come out.

We need the Blixie Chicks on the covers, not Sen. Santorum.

66 posted on 04/24/2003 12:48:51 PM PDT by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: ewing
Am I the only one who thinks this is a positive? But for the intimidation tactics of the gaystapo, many people would be saying what Santorum said and more. People who answer polls will say "I don't care what so and so does in their bedroom," but don't kid yourself, they see the connection. People just don't like conflict and they don't want to be labeled so they keep quiet. The very few people I know who say they support any part of the gay agenda also say "but I think they are immoral." People know right from wrong. They just don't want to be called names. They will be glad a politician stood up for them. They will applaud Santorum even in silence.
78 posted on 04/24/2003 12:55:19 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: ewing
Sooner or later we're gonna have to stop sacrificing leaders on the alter of Political Correctness because, obviously, with each successive sacrifice the Left is further emboldend. Just look at how flimsy the grounds are here compared to the Lott matter. See the pattern? Hoping to slip quietly past the News Mag Cycle misses the point. Damn the News Cycle, at some point someone has to stand and fight!
90 posted on 04/24/2003 1:06:53 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson