[Jhoffa_]

What "hole"

I heard Santorum's explanation, it's perfectly logical and reasonable.

It's very defensable, if for no other reason than it's just common sense.

If you begin with the premise that consensual, sexual activity in a home cannot be regulated, then you open all kinds of doors. That's a winding road that passes by homosexual behavior and keeps right on going.

Iagine what FR's own Libertarians could do with such a concept.

Wanna screw a goat in your garage? Heeeeey, that's okay. It's all about "privacy right's" baby.. Incest? It's all good, cause of "privacy right's" (and on, and on..)

[k2blader]

Exactly.

[ewing]

I think he meant the public relations hole, as pictured by the predominant liberal media.

[sinkspur]

If you begin with the premise that consensual, sexual activity in a home cannot be regulated, then you open all kinds of doors.

I begin with the premise that consensual, adult, unmarried, sexual activity in a home cannot be enforced, if regulated.

Why regulate sodomy if you have no intention of enforcing laws against it?

[mabelkitty]

Problem is, most Republicans can't defend conservatism, and the RNC knows we can't have these boobs running around, getting distracted, getting cornered, and blowing it.

Think about it.

How many of them would you want defending your First Amendment right and this sleazy hatchet job?

Nickels is the only one I would trust. The rest are disgraceful on camera.