Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Leaders Should Remember: An Elephant Never Forgets. Where Are Santorum's Fellow Republicans?
AgapePress ^ | April 23, 2003 | Bill Fancher, Fred Jackson, and Karen Battles

Posted on 04/24/2003 10:41:52 AM PDT by Polycarp

GOP Leaders Should Remember: An Elephant Never Forgets

And Where Are Senator Santorum's Fellow Republicans When He Needs Them?

By Bill Fancher, Fred Jackson, and Karen Battles April 23, 2003

(AgapePress) - There are some who believe the Republican Party's concerted effort to garner the homosexual vote through a series of meetings with high-level GOP leaders and presidential appointments may backfire on the party.

Bob Knight Presidential advisor Karl Rove is thought to be behind the effort. But Bob Knight of the Culture and Family Institute says it is a mistake in strategy.

According to Knight, "30 to 40 percent [of Americans] are self-identified conservative, evangelical Christians -- and the gays account for less than 2 percent [of the population]." While Knight acknowledged that both groups have some that "sit on the sidelines" at voting time, he believes that evangelical Christians comprise a large portion of the GOP base.

Knight says the GOP courtship of the homosexual vote is a blunder that will cost the party their support from the evangelical community. He adds: "They're risking alienating a large portion of their base, specifically the very people who give their time and treasure to the Republican Party. It looks like a suicidal move to me." [See Earlier Related Article]

Santorum Flap In a related story, another leading pro-family voice is wondering why Republican leaders aren't coming to the defense of one of their senators who is under attack from pro-homosexual forces.

Gary Bauer Gary Bauer, the head of Campaign for Working Families, says he is astonished that the Republican establishment has not come to the defense of Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, who made headlines in the last few days for comments he made about a sodomy law in Texas that is being challenged before the Supreme Court.

Santorum said if that law is struck down, then people will have the automatic right to other sexual behavior in their home -- including polygamy and incest.

According to an article in The Washington Post, Santorum's spokeswoman, Erica Clayton Wright, said that the senator's comments related specifically to the Supreme Court case. She added that the senator "has no problem with gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender individuals."

Still, homosexual rights groups, including the Log Cabin Republicans, have condemned Santorum for those remarks and are demanding his resignation as the chairman of the Senate Republican Conference.

The Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a homosexual rights organization, has also entered the fray. In likening homosexuality to race and ethnicity, HRC spokesman David Smith compared Santorum to a racist.

"While we welcome his spokeswoman's clarification that he has no problem with gay people," Smith expounded, "it's analogous to saying, 'I have no problem with Jewish people or black people, I just don't think they should be equal under the law.'"

Bauer believes the political correctness must end, and it must be acceptable to resist the demands of the homosexual rights movement without being smeared as a bigot.

White House spokesman Ari Fleisher was asked again on Wednesday about the Santorum controversy. He indicated the president has not and will not be saying anything about it because Santorum's comments had to do with a case before the Supreme Court.

And while GOP leaders are thus far remaining silent, a Pennsylvania pro-family group is coming to Santorum's defense. Diane Gramley, the president of American Family Association of Northwestern Pennsylvania, says Santorum has been a consistent defender of family values -- and needs to be defended by those who feel the same way.

"[T]hose who believe the traditional family is the very foundation of a successful society should call on the GOP leadership to turn a deaf ear to those calling for the senator's removal," Gramley says in a news release. "It seems that the ones who are crying 'tolerance' the loudest are the ones who are the most intolerant towards those who do not totally agree with them."

She says it is apparent that those who have chosen to live in the homosexual lifestyle are determined to silence all who oppose them.

Meanwhile, Fox News reports that some Republican sources are raising concerns about the Associated Press reporter who first quoted Santorum and continues to report on the conflict. Her name is Lara Jakes Jordan. Her husband is Jim Jordan, a former official with the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee who now heads Democratic Senator John Kerry's campaign for president.

© 2003 AgapePress all rights reserved.


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: LibFreeUSA
They don't need my advice... They have smart people over there. They'll figure it out. You guys do if you plan to keeping control.
21 posted on 04/24/2003 11:31:21 AM PDT by Shroom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Shroom

The GOP does not get the gay vote as it is anyways, and most of the gay vote is concentrated in areas that are allready Democratic. The starights that ate sympathetic to them also tend to live in Democratic areas as well. This story after another week or two will blow over.
22 posted on 04/24/2003 11:31:49 AM PDT by JNB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Shroom
He needs to step down from his leadership position as of yesterday or he will be the posterchild that will be used to defeat GW and put the Democrats back in control of the House and Senate.

Here we go again.

The spineless wonders are back, tanned rested and ready.

23 posted on 04/24/2003 11:32:33 AM PDT by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Democrat enablers??
24 posted on 04/24/2003 11:33:59 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Shroom
Just curious. Thought you might know something about Him considering your mention of "Religious Zealots and nutcases who wouldn't support a Democrat if Jesus himself told them to."

BTW, what does Santorum's or any Republican's religion have to do with anything?
25 posted on 04/24/2003 11:36:07 AM PDT by k2blader ("Go not to the elves for counsel, for they will say both yes and no." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: k2blader
As long as Saint Torum uses his religion to back up his political views, it is my concern.
26 posted on 04/24/2003 11:42:14 AM PDT by Shroom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
Actually, it isn't about his faith. It's simply about whether a state has the right to make a law regulating private behavior of any sort. If there is an all encompassing "right to privacy" which proscribes the passage of any law that regulates private consensual behavior, then

That's his point and it's well worth taking. Does a society have the right to pass laws to define the structure of itself? If the Constitution says "no", then what have we been doing the last 220 years? Was it all a big mistake?

The question isn't whether homosexual acts or bigamy or polygamy or whatever is good or bad. The question is, does the Constitution forbid us from deciding, through the state legislatures, whether they are good or bad for us as a society.

27 posted on 04/24/2003 11:43:34 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
cassandras, wobblies, or just good ol' poltroons.
28 posted on 04/24/2003 11:44:11 AM PDT by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Rick needs more support before the homosexuals and RATS eliminate him altogether.
29 posted on 04/24/2003 11:47:48 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
I'm so glad the war in Iraq is almost over. Now we can go back to eating our own.
30 posted on 04/24/2003 11:51:17 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shroom
Well, you may just have to get used to it.

Faith naturally colors the worldviews of many.
31 posted on 04/24/2003 11:54:30 AM PDT by k2blader ("Go not to the elves for counsel, for they will say both yes and no." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
"I'm so glad the war in Iraq is almost over. Now we can go back to eating our own."

No $h!t. Freakin' unbelievable how some R's are political masochists. I wonder what they see when they look into the mirror!

32 posted on 04/24/2003 12:07:00 PM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
"And Where Are Senator Santorum's Fellow Republicans When He Needs Them? "

Bush is hiding in a gay proof bunker. He is leaving Santorum twisting slowly in the wind. Social Conservatives are being exited from the Republican party one by one.

This ain't your father's Republican party any more. The elephant has morphed into a RINO.

33 posted on 04/24/2003 12:10:21 PM PDT by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
ping.
34 posted on 04/24/2003 12:14:38 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Shroom
You must be a Republican strategist...fearful of your own shadow.

Did you work on Ford's campaign?
35 posted on 04/24/2003 12:32:09 PM PDT by Lee_Atwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shroom
I think he should stay exactly where he is! Why in the world would you suggest he "cave" to liberal pressure?

I've voiced my opinion on his stand, and I won't back down it it either.

I think we should all ignore this crap just like he is. He needs to move on. Not apologize for it or anthing.

36 posted on 04/24/2003 12:35:46 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife ("CNN - WE report WHEN WE decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shroom
You need to lay off your "username"(s)
37 posted on 04/24/2003 12:37:57 PM PDT by wardaddy (Hootie (not of Blowfish) to head EEOC...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shroom
Rick Santorum should have kept his mouth shut if he truly wanted to increase the Republican Majority

Yep, we've got to throw principle out the window when it comes to votes right? And some people wonder why the 'conservative' movement is having problems. Could it be half the people in the party aren't even conservatives and are more interested in power?

38 posted on 04/24/2003 12:39:12 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Republicans are indeed white....scared of their own shadaows and terrified of being called "not nice".

Sad....they must all bow and lick the feet of the PC Baal.
39 posted on 04/24/2003 12:40:06 PM PDT by wardaddy (Hootie (not of Blowfish) to head EEOC...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
No, it is about his First Amendments rights being violated.

I refuse to be distracted from that very basic fact.
40 posted on 04/24/2003 12:41:51 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson