Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reactionary
My point was that if one accepts that consent and privacy are the two criteria by which one establishes whether or not sexual behavior should be legal, then there is no reason to prohibit a sadist from murdering a masochist for sexual pleasure.

I don't think anyone in their right mind would say that "consent and privacy" by themselves are the two criteria by which one establishes whether or not sexual behavior of any kind should be legal.

However, when it comes to homosexuality, unmarried sex or adultery between consenting adults in the privacy of their own homes...most Americans simply don't want police barging into people's bedrooms and arresting them.

Rick Santorum should clarify if is supporting the idea of police arresting and jailing adults for private acts of adultery or homosexuality.

219 posted on 04/27/2003 7:40:19 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: Jorge
"I don't think anyone in their right mind would say that "consent and privacy" by themselves are the two criteria by which one establishes whether or not sexual behavior of any kind should be legal."

I beg to disagree. The two ideas at work concerning this issue are the issues of consent and privacy. If you are aware of others, I'm willing to listen.

221 posted on 04/27/2003 9:21:56 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson