Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LavaDog
You're right Clinton would never have won without Perot's help. There is a very good lesson to be learned from that loss and that is to solidify the party base, no matter how painful.

That lesson is the major reason that the Democrats have moved so far to the left. If they tried to stay in the middle, Nader would have pulled away the most vocal half of their base and they would have been in a lose/lose situation. I hope they still are in a lose/lose situation.
38 posted on 04/24/2003 11:44:41 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Eva
Wait a minute....... if the Dims solidify 'their base' they become too liberal and lose the election (which is precisely what they seem to be doing now).

Depending on what you are calling the President's 'base'......and what some others on this forum call his base......it would stand to reason that by appealing to them, he would move too far right to win a national election, and we'd be in big trouble.

I guess I'm confused as to what you consider to be the 'good lesson' to be learned from the mess that Perot caused in the '92 election. Do you mind clarifying it?

43 posted on 04/24/2003 3:22:56 PM PDT by ohioWfan (President BUSH.....Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson