I think the fact that this article comes from the Guardian gives these charges even more credibility. You know that if Galloway was innocent they would be defending him. The fact that they aren't means that they know Galloway is guilty and they also realize how much damage he is doing to the whole antiwar movement.
You posted: I think the fact that this article comes from the Guardian gives these charges even more credibility. You know that if Galloway was innocent they would be defending him. The fact that they aren't means that they know Galloway is guilty and they also realize how much damage he is doing to the whole antiwar movement.