Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vannrox
Bump for later, if I ever find time to read again. Very interesting.
3 posted on 04/24/2003 6:04:18 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
Reason ... philosophy ... religion ... literature ... fantasy ... dreams, and all of the feelings, emotions and pathos of our every day lives ... all of it was no longer worthy of the painter's craft. Any hint by the artist at trying to portray such things was branded as banal, maudlin, photographic, illustration, or petty sentimentality.

Unfortunately, a lot of what was turned out in 19th Century Art and Literature WAS banal, maudlin, and pettily sentimental.
The modernists threw out the baby with the bathwater.
The traditionalists want to keep everything, resulting in epidemic waves of intelectual diabetes.

Like any subject revolving around taste and quality, what is needed is a great deal of discrimination.
Both traditionalists and modernists are guilty of judging primarily by a works "school" rather than it's inate quality.
Art, music and books have to be judged individually on their merits, not as members of some "school" or "movement" and thus automatically to be praised or desparaged.

So9

7 posted on 04/24/2003 6:30:21 AM PDT by Servant of the Nine (Think of it as Evolution In Action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson