Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: honest injun
1) I stated that this decision could begin the overturning of Roe v Wade. Maybe Griswold, too...but Roe is the first one which will logically fall.

2) Contraception is immoral and strictly speaking should be illegal. It is un-natural. Having said that, there's little enthusiasm for putting a law against it on the books and it won't happen.

This case is about States' Rights, not about Federal "rights" to immorality. If it were about Federal Rights to be Immoral, the IRS would be history.
48 posted on 04/24/2003 7:50:10 AM PDT by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: ninenot
"This case is about States' Rights, not about Federal "rights" to immorality"

Something we can agree. The Texas law will be struck down on equal protection. As you stated, there is "little enthusiasm" for outlawing contraception so, overturning Griswold is errrr, not politically practical?

So much for logical consistency.
53 posted on 04/24/2003 7:59:16 AM PDT by honest injun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson