Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: laredo44
Establishment of Memorial Day? Government has the power to raise and army and navy to protect our rights to life, liberty, and property. Memorial Day can be a way to express our gratitude to those who served, thereby encouraging future citizens to choose such service in protection of our rights.

No, government can only pass laws protecting individual rights. You are talking about "public relations".

Postal System? Probably an internal mechanism of government as it exercised its just powers. Elements of government must communicate among themselves and with the citizenry.

No, government can only pass laws protecting individual rights. The governments internal mechanism does not protect individual rights.

Scientific Research? Depends on the project. Some might be justified under research for military purposes. Protection of property rights could be cited for things like pesticides. Protection of life for medical research.

No, government can only pass laws protecting individual rights. You state military advancement and property rights.

Interstate Highway? Was justified by Eisenhower for efficient military movement and civilian evacuation should we be attacked.

No, government can only pass laws protecting individual rights. Public goals such as mass evacuation is not a protection of individual rights.

See how difficult it is to realistically deal with any legislative question with the phrase:

No, government can only pass laws protecting individual rights.

169 posted on 04/24/2003 3:09:58 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]


To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Your entire post makes so little sense, I'm tempted to ignore it as the rant of someone who has no intention of engaging in rational debate. However, on the chance that you are open to discussion, I'll elaborate on one point and await a reasonable reply.

No, government can only pass laws protecting individual rights. You state military advancement ...

I stated that our government is exercising a just power ceded it by its citizens to secure their individual rights to life and property from foreign invasion. The purpose of the army is to protect each of our individual rights. In order to secure those rights, the army must be prepared to repel an invasion. To repel an invasion, they must have weapons capable of doing so. How effective do you imagine our army would be repelling an invader today using musket and ball? About as effective as the Iraqi army was stopping us? Probably less so. How is the army supposed to move from a musket and ball capability to one capable of defending our rights today? One way is to devise new weapons. One part of devising new weapons is to "research" them. There is nothing specifying how the government exercising its justly ceded power to accomplish that research. Empowering means they decide how.

If you can't make the connection between military research and the ability of the army to protect our rights, I have nothing left to discuss with you.

170 posted on 04/24/2003 3:47:35 PM PDT by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson