To: patent
A change while the economy is on the rocks would be a bad thing, though. It would be different if there were serious concerns about Greenspan's competence, and/or a clearly stronger candidate available, but in the absence of either of those things, a change (or announcement of an expected change) would just spook the markets and the economy all over again.
To: GovernmentShrinker
>>>>would just spook the markets and the economy all over again.
Yeah, but now that the war is over CNBC needs a new excuse for the markets tanking, should that happen again. A greenspan resignation would provide a good soundbite, saving all those poor talking heads from thinking.
Please, do it for the talking heads (children?). ;-)
6 posted on
04/23/2003 2:15:27 PM PDT by
patent
(A baby is God's opinion that life should go on. Carl Sandburg)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson