Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Russian Sub Joins Fleet: "Gepard" Claimed to be the World's Fastest and Most Awesome
Strana.ru ^ | 4/12/2003 | Michael Stedman

Posted on 04/23/2003 6:35:41 AM PDT by ex-Texan

New Russian Sub Joins Fleet: Claimed to be the World's Fastest and Most Awesome

The silent service hails a new warrior

Super-silent Gepard, awesome new flagship of Russia's submarine fleet, ceremonially took to northern waters of the White Sea under navy colours today (Tuesday) at a ceremony going some way to easing the wounds of the Kursk disaster and restoring marine service morale. It has been hailed as Russia-s first nuclear-powered submarine of the 21st century.

Head-of-state Vladimir Putin met the crew and sent the missile-armed, torpedo-carrying boat - named Cheetah in English - into service after successful sea and weapons trials under the blue and white Russian fleet flag of St. Andrew. The ceremony, at Severodvinsk in the Arkhangelsk region where the vessel was built, was attended by Russian Navy Fleet Admiral Vladimir Kuroyedov and the chief of the Russian General Staff, Anatoly Kvashnin, RIA Novosti news agency said.

Navy officers have already applauded the boost to pride that comes with the new vessel. Commander-in-chief Kuroyedov is on record as calling it symbolic for the lost boat to be replaced by a new submarine, noting that Russia was advancing to building a new fleet which will be a tribute to the sailors who died on Kursk.

The 110-metre-long craft is the last in a fleet of 14 Bars series submarines to be constructed. It displaces up to 12,770 tonnes, dives to a maximum depth of 600 metres and makes a top speed below the waves of 35 knots.

Gepard is served by a 63-strong crew and has an armament potential of 24 nuclear-tipped Granit cruise missiles with a range of up to 3,000 kilometres. It also carries a Strela anti-aircraft weapons system. Though much smaller than the wrecked Kursk, Gepard is viewed as the most formidable ship in the Russian Navy. Construction began in 1991.

Western naval observers say the submarine-s arrival is an important step forward. U.S. experts believe Gepard may move as fast and as quietly as America's best fully-operational boats of the Los Angeles class, and have the capacity to dive deeper and harness more firepower, according to a report on the U.S. ABCNews international website.

The new boat is named to honour a World War 1 Russian submarine. As a comparison, its forerunner moved at 8.5 knots and submerged to a maximum depth of 50 metres. It's arsenal was two cannon, a machine-gun and 12 torpedoes.

An official act transferring and commissioning the new boat was signed at the Sevmashpredpriyatiye industrial plant at Severodvinsk yesterday.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: newrussiansub; russiamilitary; russianavy; submarine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
Found this while surfing on Russian news sources. Apologize if it has been posted before.
1 posted on 04/23/2003 6:35:41 AM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
...under the blue and white Russian fleet flag of St. Andrew.

My how times have changed.


Russian Fleet Flag "St. Andrew"


2 posted on 04/23/2003 6:38:36 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Gepard is viewed as the most formidable ship in the Russian Navy. Construction began in 1991.

P-3 fodder.

3 posted on 04/23/2003 6:39:40 AM PDT by grobdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
bttt
4 posted on 04/23/2003 6:40:27 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Semper Gumby - Always flexible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

It is not how quiet you build them. It is how much money you spend to keep them quiet.

5 posted on 04/23/2003 6:45:09 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Semper Gumby - Always flexible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
More radioactive junk on the ocean floor.
6 posted on 04/23/2003 6:52:40 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Interesting that the Russians would name their sub after a Missouri Congressman.

7 posted on 04/23/2003 6:53:06 AM PDT by So Cal Rocket (God bless the coalition troops and their families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Wish our "Gepard" was as quiet in his presidential run. Keeps trying to take all our tax money.
8 posted on 04/23/2003 6:55:16 AM PDT by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
named Cheetah in English

Maybe they confused him with Tarzan's chimp.

9 posted on 04/23/2003 6:55:28 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Interesting. Where are the Russians now on this type of technlogy now? I remember at the height of the Cold War, they always lagged about 10-15 years behind us in the tech sector..
10 posted on 04/23/2003 6:55:34 AM PDT by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
The Russians named their new attack sub after the Congressman from Missouri for two reasons. First, it is in recognition of all he did and has done for the communists and other anti-Americans, worldwide. Second, it is a hope that if Russia and America ever go to war, the sub will do as much damage to America as it's namesake has done.
11 posted on 04/23/2003 7:01:22 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
So is this what Russia used all that cash from "Oil for Food and Medicine" on?

Sure wasn't the space station.

The article doesn't say how much it cost to build.

12 posted on 04/23/2003 7:07:10 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
Russian boats got much quieter in the 1980s and 1990s, thanks (in part) to precision machining technology transferred illegally from Japan's Toshiba Corporation, to the former Soviet Union. The high-tech machines acquired from Toshiba allowed the Russians to build propellers and shafts that were much quieter...anti-submarine warfare is not my speciality, but I've been told that the Navy was "stunned" by how quiet the new Russian boats were.

From a technical standpoint, the new Russian sub (looks like an advanced Akula-class) looks impressive. But there are some fundamental weaknesses in the Russian sub fleet, including crew training and the sub fleet's operational schedule. These days, Russian subs--even the attack boats--spend a lot more time at the dock than underway. That translates into less time at sea, and less time for crew training. The Gepard may be technically advanced, but it is no match for a late-model Los Angeles-class SSN/SSGN, with a much better trained crew.

Overall conditions in the Russian sub fleet remain dismal, despite the addition of this new boat. Two indications: the Russian sub threat to our fleet has decreased so dramatically that all of the carrier-based S-3 Viking sub hunters have been converted to tanker and electronic combat missions. Additionally, the number of Russian sub hulls has declined to the point that their Pacific fleet may no longer have an operational SSBN--a ballistic missile boat--by 1995.

13 posted on 04/23/2003 7:07:52 AM PDT by Spook86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Illbay

Alabama State Flag

15 posted on 04/23/2003 7:15:16 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Too bad they misspelled little Dick Gephardt's name. I mean, honoring the Democratic Congressman for all of the work he's one on their behalf is really tip of the hat, but misspelling their benefactors name is just inexcusable.
16 posted on 04/23/2003 7:17:14 AM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Defund NPR, PBS and the LSC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
That's funny, I thought the same thing!! Now I know why he is never in Missouri, it busy with the Russians.
17 posted on 04/23/2003 7:17:46 AM PDT by surelyclintonsbaddream
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: scott7278
ping
18 posted on 04/23/2003 7:19:02 AM PDT by surelyclintonsbaddream
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
Too bad they misspelled little Dick Gephardt's name.

Maybe they spelled it that way because it only kinda looks like him, except the sub has eyebrows...

19 posted on 04/23/2003 7:20:28 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
Interesting post. The Sovs and the Russians today, arent known for quality control. I guess Im just surprised to hear of any Russian breakthroughs. When one thinks of the Kursk, commissioned in 94(?), and its untimely demise, as well as air disasters, mining cave ins, space explosions, and bio-weapon escapes, it makes it hard to champion Russian engineering feats.
20 posted on 04/23/2003 7:22:50 AM PDT by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson