Skip to comments.
James Madison stops providing 'morning after' pill to students
The Daily Press (Virginia) ^
| April 19, 2003
Posted on 04/23/2003 12:34:01 AM PDT by nickcarraway
HARRISONBURG, Va. -- In response to a complaint from a state legislator, James Madison University will stop providing "morning after" birth-control pills at its campus health center.
The state-supported college's board of visitors voted Friday to stop dispensing the emergency contraception pill after receiving a letter from Del. Robert Marshall, R-Manassas, criticizing the practice.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailypress.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Delaware; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: abortion; bobmarshall; delaware; ecp; gmu; jmu; levonorgestrel; morningafterpill; prolife; robertmarshall; ru486; vageneralassembly; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: nickcarraway
Student leaders want university to reverse pill decisionApril 22, 2003
HARRISONBURG, Va. -- Student leaders at James Madison University are trying to reverse a school decision to stop selling a "morning after" contraceptive pill available on campus for eight years.
Student leaders want university to reverse pill decision
To: Canticle_of_Deborah; Desdemona
ping
To: nickcarraway
The morning after pill is a good idea.
Having a college dispense it may not be.
4
posted on
04/23/2003 4:15:35 AM PDT
by
RJCogburn
(Yes, I will call it bold talk for a......)
To: RJCogburn
The morning after pill is a good idea.While I agree that the pill may have its place, I disagree about it being a good idea. Especially in today's world of deadly STDs. It would seem that the morning after pill would further encourage unprotected sex and increase the incidence of AIDS and other STDs.
5
posted on
04/23/2003 4:50:31 AM PDT
by
trebb
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: nickcarraway
BUMP
Morning after pills definitely do not promote thinking responsibly. And giving them away, IMO, is promoting some very dangerous practices. Aside from that, too much of it can't be good for you.
7
posted on
04/23/2003 4:55:10 AM PDT
by
Desdemona
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: seamole
The "morning after" pill and RU-486 are two different meds.
The "morning after" pill is really just a high dose of birth control pills meant to stop implantation before it occurs. RU-486 is truly a chemical abortion. I am NOT advocating either, so please don't flame me, I am just explaining the difference.
"Morning After"= Morning after unprotected intercourse.
RU486= Chemical abortion up to, I believe 6-8 weeks gestation of a baby.
10
posted on
04/23/2003 5:10:11 AM PDT
by
codercpc
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: RJCogburn
The morning after pill is a good idea Only if you want students to die. RU 486 requires physicians monitoring in case of severe bleading which can result in death. The Article does not mention this critical fact, a clear sign that the writer is pro-abortion.
The University has been derelict in their duty to protect students if they have been giving this out like candy. Just another University going off the deep end.
12
posted on
04/23/2003 6:13:09 AM PDT
by
sr4402
To: sr4402
See post #10
Two different meds.
13
posted on
04/23/2003 6:29:53 AM PDT
by
codercpc
To: seamole
Campus health centers are like junior hospitals. They have doctors and nurses on staff. They aren't giving out prescription drugs in grab bags.Right. I was referring more to the question of whether that type of therapy ought to be available in that setting.
These may become available over the counter soon which eliminates that consideration. That would also be a good idea.
14
posted on
04/23/2003 11:09:12 AM PDT
by
RJCogburn
(Yes, I will call it bold talk for a......)
To: trebb
That is a reasonable thought. I wonder, though, if that pill would really make much difference in the incidence of unprotected sex.
15
posted on
04/23/2003 11:10:43 AM PDT
by
RJCogburn
(Yes, I will call it bold talk for a......)
To: sr4402
Only if you want students to die. RU 486 requires physicians monitoring in case of severe bleading which can result in death. The Article does not mention this critical fact, a clear sign that the writer is pro-abortion.As the post following yours points out, you are confused about what drug you mean. I suppose that might justify some people to claim you respond reflexively to anything on the abortion/birth control subject.
16
posted on
04/23/2003 11:13:49 AM PDT
by
RJCogburn
(Yes, I will call it bold talk for a......)
To: nickcarraway
This is pretty silly, in that I doubt JMU's health center is going to stop dispensing birth control pills. All the Morning After Pill is is just a high dose of pills. You can make your own by taking 3-4 regular pills w/in 72 hours of unprotected sex, and taking another 3-4 12 hours later.
All they're doing is keeping women who don't know that (ie, panicked freshmen girls) from possibly preventing a pregnancy. The smart ones will just go and ask for a regular birth control pill prescription.
17
posted on
04/23/2003 11:16:19 AM PDT
by
laurav
To: trebb
While I agree that the pill may have its place, I disagree about it being a good idea. Especially in today's world of deadly STDs. It would seem that the morning after pill would further encourage unprotected sex and increase the incidence of AIDS and other STDs.Most women use the morning after pill after a condom breaks -- they were trying to have protected sex, it just didn't work. In that case, STD transmission may be a done deal, but if you can still prevent pregnancy, one out of two is better than none.
18
posted on
04/23/2003 11:19:34 AM PDT
by
laurav
To: laurav
from possibly preventing a pregnancy.Not accurate medically speaking. They are possibly ending a pregnancy.
To: laurav
Most women use the morning after pill after a condom breaks -- they were trying to have protected sex, it just didn't work.Do you have a source for that? I've seen data that looks very different.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson