Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SARS Cases in Hong Kong Have Begun to Level Off
New York Times ^ | 4-22-03 | KEITH BRADSHER

Posted on 04/22/2003 9:35:20 PM PDT by Prince Charles

SARS Cases in Hong Kong Have Begun to Level Off

By KEITH BRADSHER

HONG KONG, April 22 ? The number of people infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome has leveled off here in the last week, although the disease is unlikely to be eradicated for a long time, if ever, health officials said today.

Hong Kong has had more cases of the disease, known as SARS, than any other city, although Beijing is starting to catch up. There are still two dozen to three dozen new cases each day here, and Hong Kong still has almost as many people hospitalized with SARS as the entire rest of the world, including mainland China.

Yet there has been some improvement here. As recently as a week ago, some experts were warning that a rising tide of SARS patients could overwhelm hospitals, filling all of the beds in intensive care wards.

The State Department has warned that Americans who fall sick here or in China may find the medical systems already overstretched.

But the number of people in hospitals here with probable cases of SARS peaked at 960 on Thursday and has since fallen 9 percent, to 874 this afternoon. While 137 people have fallen ill with SARS in the last five days, 189 have recovered and been discharged from hospitals. Another 34 have died, most of them elderly.

Dr. Yeoh Eng-kiong, Hong Kong's secretary of health, welfare and food, cautioned at a news conference this afternoon, "We do not anticipate it will be eradicated completely, because it is a highly infectious virus."

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: sars

1 posted on 04/22/2003 9:35:20 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Some encouagement, huh?
2 posted on 04/22/2003 9:38:12 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Yeah, I guess we should be glad we have to live with it forever. :-/
3 posted on 04/22/2003 9:39:38 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

While 137 people have fallen ill with SARS in the last five days, 189 have recovered and been discharged from hospitals. Another 34 have died, most of them elderly.

That's still a 15% death rate, folks.

4 posted on 04/22/2003 9:42:17 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
The NYT hired Bagdhad Bill?
5 posted on 04/22/2003 9:46:33 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Come on, your royal highness, deal with facts and mathmatics.

Figures just updated 15 minutes ago:

1,458 total cummulative
522 discharged
105 deaths
7.2% mortality rate
6 posted on 04/23/2003 2:18:17 AM PDT by FreepForever (China is the hub of all evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreepForever
You don't know how the story ends for those folks still in hospital. Your 7.2% figure assumes that every single one of those nine hundred people will get well.
7 posted on 04/23/2003 5:12:39 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dinodino
I understand what you mean. I have the same question too. Another way of calculating the mortality rate is to interpret it as a (deaths/discharged+deaths proportion). In this case, it would be:

105/(522+105) = 16.74%

Again, this calculation is also biased. Because the deaths are actually resulting from a total of 1,458 patients, not 522+105=627 patients.

But that's not the way WHO is collating the data. They use the deaths/total all over the world.
8 posted on 04/23/2003 5:54:01 AM PDT by FreepForever (China is the hub of all evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreepForever
I don't really understand how the epidemiologists calculate their numbers. Whether 7% or 20%, though, SARS is bad news.
9 posted on 04/23/2003 7:09:36 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles; CathyRyan; Mother Abigail; Dog Gone; Petronski; per loin; riri; flutters; ...
Big White Guy reports from Hong Kong:

SARS: 99 Bottles of Beer on the Wall

To date, 99 people in Hong Kong have died as a result of SARS.

But thankfully, the increases are slowing. As the territory approaches 1,500 cases, I look back to the news of only two weeks ago predicting dire consequences should Hong Kong see 3,000 cases by the end of April. Barring some freak event, it certainly doesn't appear that's going to happen.

The numbers of people being released has taken large jumps in the past few days, but no one seems to be interested in those successes. Mostly what I've seen in the news is a continuation of the doom and gloom theme. I think it's high time medical workers who have been putting themselves at risk get some real honest-to-goodness coverage for the excellent job they've been doing.

Were it not for them, I suspect the death toll would be much, much higher.

10 posted on 04/23/2003 7:43:45 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I think it's high time medical workers who have been putting themselves at risk get some real honest-to-goodness coverage for the excellent job they've been doing.

Were it not for them, I suspect the death toll would be much, much higher.

Well said.

11 posted on 04/23/2003 7:48:11 AM PDT by CathyRyan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Hong Kong reports six more deaths now, bringing the total to 105.
12 posted on 04/23/2003 8:15:21 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FreepForever
...deal with facts and mathmatics...

The figures presented in the story were for the 5 days preceding. And yes, 15% is the correct mortality rate for that 5-day period.

Maybe you need to spend some time with ArithmeticForever.

13 posted on 04/23/2003 9:30:37 AM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson