To: Pokey78
Why is there no mention in this article of the Corvette? I am a lady, I have never owned a Corvette and never will, but I love them just the same; they seem beautiful to me from an artistic standpoint, and I even love to see them vanish in the distance ahead of me in just a few seconds.
2 posted on
04/22/2003 9:10:41 PM PDT by
Capriole
(Foi vainquera)
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
Why is there no mention in this article of the Corvette?Because though the Corvette will speed off into the sunset ahead of you, you won't feel it like you will feel up the length of your spine when the throaty rumble and roar of a 1971 Oldsmobile 442 at full throttle with all four barrels of her carburator wide open as it passes you in the left lane...
"Hold muh beer 'n watch this!" PING....
If you want on or off this list, please let me know!
8 posted on
04/22/2003 9:21:57 PM PDT by
mhking
To: Capriole
The Corvette may be a lot of things, but it was NEVER a muscle car.
12 posted on
04/22/2003 9:25:53 PM PDT by
mhking
To: Capriole
Corvettes are 50K cars. Camaro was priced much less. GM was incredibly stupid for killing the Camaro.
88 posted on
04/22/2003 10:38:29 PM PDT by
optik_b
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson