You like vanilla, I like chocolate. I don't care about your preferences. I have my own so what's your beef? I don't care if you don't like my preferences. That is, of course, utterly irrelevant. In fact, it supports my argument. I already pointed out ad nauseum that if moral inclinations arise from natural causes, than they are not automatically compelling--they are just inclinations, like the desire to run, not bindinging physical laws, such as they ought to be, if God was paying attention when He provided Them.
Then you of all people should have no motive at all to argue any points about morality. My moral view is just my preference and from your POV, all communities are morally equal, so it is very strange for you to persist. What's your beef? Besides you contradicted yourself trying to tell me that moral absolutism was an incorrect model - but it can't be wrong! (don't make me go back and find your post because if I have to do that - and I WILL - it will just cause you further embarrassment).