Skip to comments.
France Meets U.S. Halfway on Iraq Sanctions Lift (New Info)
Reuters ^
| April 22, 2003
Posted on 04/22/2003 2:52:38 PM PDT by Shermy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
04/22/2003 2:52:38 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: marron; Dog; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; aculeus; aristeides; GailA; nicmarlo; w_over_w
Update.
2
posted on
04/22/2003 2:53:41 PM PDT
by
Shermy
(Full disclosure of Food For Oil books...No Compromise!!!)
To: Registered
3
posted on
04/22/2003 2:58:12 PM PDT
by
Shermy
(Full disclosure of Food For Oil books...No Compromise!!!)
To: Shermy; GailA
De La Sabihre is on FOX now. What a weasel. Says they want to phase out this particular Oil for Food program slowly so as not to disrupt food distribution. What food distribution? And that they want to make adjustments, which sounds like they want a new Oil for Food program to me. (Why can't the Iraqis sell their own darned oil in the future?) DLS says more transparency needed. Duh. But it sounds as though the French want to make sure, when all is said and done, that the UN keeps its mitts on Iraq's oil money.
4
posted on
04/22/2003 3:02:29 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Shermy
Ah yes, Reuters writes another fairy tale about France and post war Iraq!
5
posted on
04/22/2003 3:04:20 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
To: mewzilla
Yep, this mornings headlines were to optimistic.
He wants "more" transparancy. What's that, 1% more? See my tag line.
6
posted on
04/22/2003 3:09:10 PM PDT
by
Shermy
(Full disclosure of Food For Oil books...No Compromise!!!)
To: Shermy
But France's U.N. ambassador, Jean-Marc de la Sabliere, said the U.N. oil-for-food program, which collects Iraq's oil revenues, should be kept under U.N. control for the time being but adjusted to Iraq's current needs. Gee, I wonder why the frenchies want the UN to keep collection oil revenues? /sarcasm
But the United States, in contrast to other council members including Britain, is cool to Blix, who will retire on June 30. Instead it is recruiting former U.N. inspectors from the United States, Britain and Australia to verify any discovery of banned weapons by the military.
Yes, the UN Inspectors proved themselves as useless and irrelevant as the UN.
7
posted on
04/22/2003 3:10:12 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: Shermy
The Bush administration wants the sanctions lifted entirely and reacted coolly to the French proposals. Let the games begin . . . and "Cowboys" are damn good poker players. Especially ours . . . yup!
8
posted on
04/22/2003 3:12:31 PM PDT
by
w_over_w
(TAG line under construction . . . don't hold your breath.)
To: w_over_w
If the sanctions need reauthorized in June, the US needs to use its veto power. Another tactic would be to resign from the UN. This is my favorite solution to the problem.
9
posted on
04/22/2003 3:26:21 PM PDT
by
meenie
To: Shermy
"A Whore is a Whore...of course of course!"
10
posted on
04/22/2003 3:28:15 PM PDT
by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: nicmarlo
The French plan seems to be only to remove the name "sanctions" and keep every thing else the same.
11
posted on
04/22/2003 3:31:26 PM PDT
by
Shermy
(Full disclosure of Food For Oil books...No Compromise!!!)
To: nicmarlo
Gee, I wonder why the frenchies want the UN to keep collection oil revenues? /sarcasm
To sell overpriced French agriculture products to the UN for Iraq ?
12
posted on
04/22/2003 3:31:36 PM PDT
by
John Lenin
(Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy)
To: Shermy
The French plan seems to be only to remove the name "sanctions" and keep every thing else the same. Yes, but what do you expect? the frenchies are humans in name only. : )
13
posted on
04/22/2003 3:36:38 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: John Lenin
To sell overpriced French agriculture products to the UN for Iraq ? Nope; that's strike one. You get two more guesses! : )
14
posted on
04/22/2003 3:37:20 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: meenie
Another tactic would be to resign from the UN. This is my favorite solution to the problem.I understand your sentiments . . . I mean the UN can be as useless as hen sh!t on a water pump handle. But I prefer we be a UNMINO (UN member in name only) and use it politically to our advantage . . . at least until it becomes another "League of Nations". IMHO.
15
posted on
04/22/2003 3:38:06 PM PDT
by
w_over_w
(TAG line under construction . . . don't hold your breath.)
To: Shermy
I don't get it. Blix et al keep saying there are no WMD, but in the same breath, they want the sanctions to remain in place -- wtf?
To: Shermy
Thanks for URL.
17
posted on
04/22/2003 4:20:48 PM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
( Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed.)
To: Shermy
FOX had a soundbite from a guy named Bevan Sevan (sp) a little while ago, who's with the Oil for Food program. This guy said that there had been over 100 audits of the program, and that Security Council members had gotten reports on the audits. Anyone heard anything about audits, if any have been done and if so, by whom?
18
posted on
04/22/2003 4:23:26 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Shermy; *war_list; W.O.T.; 11th_VA; Libertarianize the GOP; Free the USA; knak; sakka; lainde; ...
19
posted on
04/22/2003 4:23:53 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Where is Saddam? and where is Tom Daschle?)
To: Shermy
Chirac called Bush twice last week. First time was to inform Bush about a "pragmatic" approach on the issue of Iraq. Call was 20 minutes. Chirac called Bush again on Friday. Today, while being interviewed, France's U.N. ambassador, Jean-Marc de la Sabliere used the term "pragmatic" approach on the issue of Iraq. France breaks with the stance of Germany and Russia. Question: what was the tradeoff in this "pragmatic" approach for France to call for the lifting of UN sanctions, which is reiterating Bush's request? Possibly Total Fina Elf's continuted production in Iraq while still under France's control?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson