Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

France Meets U.S. Halfway on Iraq Sanctions Lift (New Info)
Reuters ^ | April 22, 2003

Posted on 04/22/2003 2:52:38 PM PDT by Shermy

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - In a surprise move, France on Tuesday backed an immediate suspension of U.N. sanctions against Iraq, meeting the United States half way in its drive to get the embargoes lifted.

But France's U.N. ambassador, Jean-Marc de la Sabliere, said the U.N. oil-for-food program, which collects Iraq's oil revenues, should be kept under U.N. control for the time being but adjusted to Iraq's current needs.

"We should immediately suspend the sanctions," de la Sabliere said. "And about the oil-for-food program, we think there should be some adjustment to the program with a view to phasing out this program."

De la Sabliere said that financial and some trade sanctions needed to be suspended to enable Iraq to get back on its feet.

The Bush administration wants the sanctions lifted entirely and reacted coolly to the French proposals.

Unlike Russia, France did not insist that U.N. arms inspectors first verify Iraq no longer had weapons of mass destruction before there could be movement on sanctions.

"The lifting of the sanctions, which is, I think the objective of all of us, is linked to the certification of the disarmament of Iraq," de la Sabliere said. "Meanwhile we could suspend the sanctions and adjust the oil for food program with the idea of phasing it out."

The embargoes were imposed in August 1990 shortly after Iraq invaded Kuwait.

The oil-for-food program, which comes up for renewal in June, is the key to Iraq's spending oil revenues for reconstruction after the U.S.-led invasion that deposed President Saddam Hussein's government. Oil proceeds are deposited in a U.N. escrow account out of which food, medicine and other civilian goods for Iraq are purchased.

The French ambassador made the comments to reporters after a closed-door Security Council meeting called to hear a briefing by chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix and discuss the Iraq crisis for the first time since the end of the war.

But the United States, in contrast to other council members including Britain, is cool to Blix, who will retire on June 30. Instead it is recruiting former U.N. inspectors from the United States, Britain and Australia to verify any discovery of banned weapons by the military.

'SANCTIONS LIFTED NOT SUSPENDED'

John Negroponte, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said sanctions should be lifted rather than suspended as soon as possible and "we look forward to working together with the delegation of France and other delegations toward that end."

State Department spokesman Richard Boucher was cooler, saying, "It may be a move sort of in the right direction, some beginning of understanding that the situation is different. But the situation is so much different that there is no reason for the sanctions any more."

Negroponte reaffirmed that the return of the U.N. inspection unit Blix heads, the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC), was not foreseen.

"The coalition has assumed responsibility for disarming of Iraq," Negroponte said. "Now that there is a somewhat more permissive military environment the coalition effort will be substantially increased and expanded."

Russia's U.N. Ambassador Sergei Lavrov made it clear that Security Council resolutions tie the lifting or suspension of sanctions to verification by inspectors that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, or WMDs.

"We are not at all opposing lifting of sanctions. What we are insisting on is that Security Council resolutions must be implemented," Lavrov told reporters. But he said he was "ready to discuss the French proposal."

"We all want to know that there are no WMDs in Iraq, and the only way to verify it is to have inspectors in Iraq and to see for themselves and to report back to the Security Council. As soon as they deliver their report the sanctions could be lifted," he said.

With the Bush administration ignoring a U.N. role in postwar Iraq, Blix has been faulted by U.S. officials for not coming up with a "smoking gun" on Baghdad's dangerous weapons, a prime reason for the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

"We may not be the only ones in the world who have credibility but I do think we have credibility for being objective and independent," Blix told reporters.

He denied he was in competition with whatever the United States planned on inspection in Iraq but noted that UNMOVIC had an enormous database with information on what had been said and found in Iraq in the past.

Blix said inspectors called in by the United States would be objective.

"But at the same time I am also convinced that the world and the Security Council (would) like to have the inspection and verification bear the imprint of independence and of some institution that is authorized by the whole international community," Blix said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chirac; france; olivebranch; totalfinaelf; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 04/22/2003 2:52:38 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marron; Dog; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; aculeus; aristeides; GailA; nicmarlo; w_over_w
Update.
2 posted on 04/22/2003 2:53:41 PM PDT by Shermy (Full disclosure of Food For Oil books...No Compromise!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Al Bundy's comments on France
3 posted on 04/22/2003 2:58:12 PM PDT by Shermy (Full disclosure of Food For Oil books...No Compromise!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shermy; GailA
De La Sabihre is on FOX now. What a weasel. Says they want to phase out this particular Oil for Food program slowly so as not to disrupt food distribution. What food distribution? And that they want to make adjustments, which sounds like they want a new Oil for Food program to me. (Why can't the Iraqis sell their own darned oil in the future?) DLS says more transparency needed. Duh. But it sounds as though the French want to make sure, when all is said and done, that the UN keeps its mitts on Iraq's oil money.
4 posted on 04/22/2003 3:02:29 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Ah yes, Reuters writes another fairy tale about France and post war Iraq!
5 posted on 04/22/2003 3:04:20 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Yep, this mornings headlines were to optimistic.

He wants "more" transparancy. What's that, 1% more? See my tag line.

6 posted on 04/22/2003 3:09:10 PM PDT by Shermy (Full disclosure of Food For Oil books...No Compromise!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
But France's U.N. ambassador, Jean-Marc de la Sabliere, said the U.N. oil-for-food program, which collects Iraq's oil revenues, should be kept under U.N. control for the time being but adjusted to Iraq's current needs.

Gee, I wonder why the frenchies want the UN to keep collection oil revenues? /sarcasm

But the United States, in contrast to other council members including Britain, is cool to Blix, who will retire on June 30. Instead it is recruiting former U.N. inspectors from the United States, Britain and Australia to verify any discovery of banned weapons by the military.

Yes, the UN Inspectors proved themselves as useless and irrelevant as the UN.

7 posted on 04/22/2003 3:10:12 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
The Bush administration wants the sanctions lifted entirely and reacted coolly to the French proposals.

Let the games begin . . . and "Cowboys" are damn good poker players. Especially ours . . . yup!

8 posted on 04/22/2003 3:12:31 PM PDT by w_over_w (TAG line under construction . . . don't hold your breath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w_over_w
If the sanctions need reauthorized in June, the US needs to use its veto power. Another tactic would be to resign from the UN. This is my favorite solution to the problem.
9 posted on 04/22/2003 3:26:21 PM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
"A Whore is a Whore...of course of course!"
10 posted on 04/22/2003 3:28:15 PM PDT by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
The French plan seems to be only to remove the name "sanctions" and keep every thing else the same.
11 posted on 04/22/2003 3:31:26 PM PDT by Shermy (Full disclosure of Food For Oil books...No Compromise!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Gee, I wonder why the frenchies want the UN to keep collection oil revenues? /sarcasm

To sell overpriced French agriculture products to the UN for Iraq ?
12 posted on 04/22/2003 3:31:36 PM PDT by John Lenin (Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
The French plan seems to be only to remove the name "sanctions" and keep every thing else the same.

Yes, but what do you expect? the frenchies are humans in name only. : )

13 posted on 04/22/2003 3:36:38 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
To sell overpriced French agriculture products to the UN for Iraq ?

Nope; that's strike one. You get two more guesses! : )

14 posted on 04/22/2003 3:37:20 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: meenie
Another tactic would be to resign from the UN. This is my favorite solution to the problem.

I understand your sentiments . . . I mean the UN can be as useless as hen sh!t on a water pump handle. But I prefer we be a UNMINO (UN member in name only) and use it politically to our advantage . . . at least until it becomes another "League of Nations". IMHO.

15 posted on 04/22/2003 3:38:06 PM PDT by w_over_w (TAG line under construction . . . don't hold your breath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I don't get it. Blix et al keep saying there are no WMD, but in the same breath, they want the sanctions to remain in place -- wtf?
16 posted on 04/22/2003 4:20:20 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Thanks for URL.
17 posted on 04/22/2003 4:20:48 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ( Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
FOX had a soundbite from a guy named Bevan Sevan (sp) a little while ago, who's with the Oil for Food program. This guy said that there had been over 100 audits of the program, and that Security Council members had gotten reports on the audits. Anyone heard anything about audits, if any have been done and if so, by whom?
18 posted on 04/22/2003 4:23:26 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy; *war_list; W.O.T.; 11th_VA; Libertarianize the GOP; Free the USA; knak; sakka; lainde; ...
Damn weasels !

OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST

19 posted on 04/22/2003 4:23:53 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and where is Tom Daschle?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Chirac called Bush twice last week. First time was to inform Bush about a "pragmatic" approach on the issue of Iraq. Call was 20 minutes. Chirac called Bush again on Friday. Today, while being interviewed, France's U.N. ambassador, Jean-Marc de la Sabliere used the term "pragmatic" approach on the issue of Iraq. France breaks with the stance of Germany and Russia. Question: what was the tradeoff in this "pragmatic" approach for France to call for the lifting of UN sanctions, which is reiterating Bush's request? Possibly Total Fina Elf's continuted production in Iraq while still under France's control?
20 posted on 04/22/2003 4:26:10 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson