Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Programmer says criticism of military cost him contract
The Globe and Mail ^ | Monday, April 21 | MATTHEW FORDAHL - Associated Press

Posted on 04/22/2003 2:45:24 PM PDT by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

A programmer of a secure, free operating system claims the U.S. research agency cut off grant money after he made an anti-war statement to a major newspaper, but officials denied the grant had been cancelled.

The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency halted the contract less than two weeks after The Globe and Mail of Toronto published a story in which programmer Theo de Raadt was quoted as saying he was “uncomfortable” about the funding source, Mr. de Raadt said.

“I try to convince myself that our grant means a half of a cruise missile doesn´t get built,” Mr. de Raadt told the newspaper.

Within a few days, Mr. de Raadt said he received an e-mail from Jonathan Smith, a computer science professor at the University of Pennsylvania and the grant´s lead researcher, expressing discomfort over the statements.

On Thursday, Mr. Smith notified Mr. de Raadt of the cancellation.

“A tenured professor was telling me not to exercise my freedom of speech,” Mr. de Raadt said.

Late Friday, DARPA spokeswoman Jan Walker said the project was under review.

“As part of our standard process, we are reviewing and evaluating the work now being done and proposed to be done in the future,” she said in an e-mailed statement. “We´re sorry if this review process has been misinterpreted as an effort to cancel the work.”

Mr. Smith declined to comment on the matter and referred calls to DARPA.

The $2.3-million (U.S.) grant had funded security improvements to the OpenBSD operating system since 2001 as well as related projects. OpenBSD, a variation of Unix designed for use on servers, is touted as so secure that its default installation has had only one bug in the past seven years.

Thousands of copies of OpenBSD have been downloaded in the past six months. It´s not clear, however, how many are in use.

Mr. De Raadt estimates about 85 percent of the DARPA grant has been spent, with about $1-million (U.S.) being used to pay for OpenBSD developers. Much of the work has been handled by a team of 80 unpaid volunteers.

Another $500,000 of the money funded the work of United Kingdom-based researchers on a related project called OpenSSL, which is used to encrypt data.

DARPA, which oversees research activities for the Pentagon, is best known for developing the network that evolved into the Internet.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: contracts; nationalsecurity
Doh!
1 posted on 04/22/2003 2:45:24 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
he should have kept his mouth close.
2 posted on 04/22/2003 2:50:49 PM PDT by green team 1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
“A tenured professor was telling me not to exercise my freedom of speech,” Mr. de Raadt said.

No, that's not what he told you. He told you, 'Speak drivel, bite hand that feeds you, get off gravy train'.

3 posted on 04/22/2003 2:52:22 PM PDT by Migraine (my grain is pretty gnarly today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

4 posted on 04/22/2003 2:52:25 PM PDT by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
He was developing a secure computer operating system for the military. How could the government continue to trust someone with those politics to not deliberately leave holes?
He became a security risk.

SO9

5 posted on 04/22/2003 2:53:32 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Programmer says criticism of military cost him contract

So don't criticize the military, imbicile. Freedom of speech means you can't be locked up, but no one has to like you or give you a job. Man these liberals are such pathetic losers.

6 posted on 04/22/2003 2:57:22 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
“A tenured professor was telling me not to exercise my freedom of speech,” Mr. de Raadt said. Not remotely. He can go flip burgers and bitch about the government all he likes.
7 posted on 04/22/2003 2:57:31 PM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Another version of this story is here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/897929/posts

In this one he says "If they take it away, it's blood money, and I don't want blood money," he said. "If they're upset by me making antiwar statements, and they take the money away for that reason, then fine. Freedom of speech in the U.S. doesn't apply to noncitizens."

Freedom of speech redefined. This guys still alive to talk isn't he?
Blood money redefined.

Ask Judas about blood money.
8 posted on 04/22/2003 3:10:17 PM PDT by Only1choice____Freedom (It's amazing how Hollywood and their Liberal friends redefine words like "Free Speech, Blood Money")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Migraine
lol...
9 posted on 04/22/2003 3:20:22 PM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
The professor was telling you not to bite the hand that feeds you!
10 posted on 04/22/2003 3:32:11 PM PDT by big bad easter bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Theo de Raadt was quoted as saying he was “uncomfortable” about the funding source, Mr. de Raadt said.

This is a loony world we live. The guy complains that he is uncomfortable about the source of the funding for his project. So what does DARPA do, they eliminate the discomfort by eliminating the money. So what does Mr. Toady de Raat do, he complains that his free speech is being violated because the funding he had previously complained about has been stopped.

11 posted on 04/22/2003 3:44:40 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Theo de Raadt

Is the 'd' in his last name silent?

12 posted on 04/22/2003 3:47:38 PM PDT by steveo (Well doctor, sometimes I feel like a nut and sometimes, well, you know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Programmer says criticism of military cost him contract

While there is no criminal penalty to free speech (as established by the First Amendment), business people should be very aware that taking an unpopular position can cost you MONEY.

Smart businesses are politically neutral. This guy and the Dixie chicks are not examples of smart business.

13 posted on 04/22/2003 3:48:46 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
“A tenured professor was telling me not to exercise my freedom of speech,” Mr. de Raadt said.

What an ignorant child. Freedom of speech means its not against the law to say something. If you purposely insult your boss, you SHOULD expect consequences. It's called not biting the hand that feeds you. Are people really this ignorant about what free speech means? It doesn't mean you are totally immune from the consequences if people don't like what you say, it merely means its not illegal.

14 posted on 04/22/2003 3:50:36 PM PDT by Godel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godel
...it merely means its not illegal.

Mr. de Raadt should contemplate the penalties for speaking out against Saddam prior to the demise of his regime.

15 posted on 04/22/2003 4:23:42 PM PDT by genew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
To those other than OpenBSD zealots, Theo is an egotistical S.O.B. Having spoken with him myself I have to agree. If he had such misgivings about the money, he should have turned it down in the first place.
16 posted on 04/22/2003 4:24:20 PM PDT by mindjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
He was developing a secure computer operating system for the military. How could the government continue to trust someone with those politics to not deliberately leave holes?
He became a security risk.

Well put! Sums it up nicely.

17 posted on 04/22/2003 4:26:36 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Fan of James Akin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson