To: doosee
Right. I know Halliburton has a contract already. They were showing this on Cavuto the other day.
Some wimpy 'can't we all get along' type was saying this looks like cronyism. Then they showed the companies who could handle the rebuilding (which, I guess, Halliburton already has the plans and equipment for, since they bought up the smaller company years ago).
The companies in question: French, German and Canadian.
Now, are we still wondering why Halliburton got the contract?
4 posted on
04/22/2003 4:40:54 AM PDT by
Mr. Thorne
(Inter armes, silent leges)
To: Mr. Thorne
I've heard that Halliburton built much of the oil infrastructure in Iraq originally, they know what's there, they have all the plans, and they represent the most expedient way to get Iraq's oil industry up and running.
Learning curve = money and time wasted.
5 posted on
04/22/2003 4:51:47 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(Never forget: CLINTON PARDONED TERRORISTS)
To: Mr. Thorne
Same with Bechtel (which I learned is a subsidary of Halliburton). It may look like cronyism, but the fact is, Bechtel has a history of building infrastructure in Iraq, and they're the best company for the job.
Also, your point about the alternatives -- German, French, and Canadian companies. People say they're concerned about the US economy and US jobs. Let the spoils go to American firms and workers. (Or British.)
8 posted on
04/22/2003 1:44:00 PM PDT by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson