You are confusing preaching the gospel to sinners with making political alliances with sinners where a quid pro quo is to NOT mention the sinfullness of their agenda.
Men have a much more visceral reaction to the homosexual agenda because we realize the cold hard reality of the brutality that is homosexual sex.
Women think its nice that "two men who love each other are allowed to hug and kiss and have warm fuzzy feelings without being discriminated against."
Sorry, but that ain't the reality of homosexuality.
Sorry, I wasn't aware that you had to be sinless to understand the Republican message, or that we have to march lock-step on every issue like those leftist drones. Maybe we should also kick out of the party all thieves, adulterers, killers, haters, coveters, people who bear false witness, who don't observe the Sabbath, and generally who don't live the way we think they should.
Let's post the message in large letters over the door of the tent: "No sinners need apply!" I wonder how many people would be left then to speak out with any strength against infantcide. Jesus took His message to prostitutes, tax collectors, and adulteresses. He opened His arms to all. He told us that He is present in the naked, the suffering, the hungry, and the imprisoned.
And I believe my party was born in the battle for the freedom of the oppressed (slaves), and it is ever a reminder that we are supposed to include even those who are different from us, because liberty and dignity are not exclusive to whites or heterosexuals, and politicians don't become "tainted" just by talking to groups who live a different life than they do.
And there are men out there that get off on two women going at it, and think that it's perfectly okay.