Skip to comments.
Federal marijuana too potent to use [Canada]
National Post (Canada) ^
| Monday, April 21, 2003
| Dean Beeby and Zev Singer
Posted on 04/21/2003 8:09:14 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
There's also a picture on the linked page.
To: canuck_conservative
"We don't want high-maintenance plants," Because they're way too stoned to take care of them?
2
posted on
04/21/2003 8:17:19 AM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Anti-American protestors are inbread liberal Notsosmartso's.)
To: canuck_conservative; mhking
My brother is a licensed grower on Oregon. I am pretty sure all high quality weed is high maintenance. Too strong? That will be the day.
3
posted on
04/21/2003 8:18:50 AM PDT
by
AdA$tra
(Tagline maintenance in progress......)
To: canuck_conservative; *Wod_list; jmc813
the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse would not share its seeds"We want no part of alleviating the suffering of sick people."
4
posted on
04/21/2003 8:19:31 AM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
To: canuck_conservative
Another argument for conservatives. Why trust government when it can't even make a weed grow?
5
posted on
04/21/2003 8:19:48 AM PDT
by
JmyBryan
To: AdA$tra
Too strong? That will be the day. LOL. Seriesly.
6
posted on
04/21/2003 8:19:52 AM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Anti-American protestors are inbread liberal Notsosmartso's.)
To: concerned about politics
"We don't want high-maintenance plants," Because they're way too stoned to take care of them?
Right, just like all brewery and distillery workers are constantly drunk.
7
posted on
04/21/2003 8:21:05 AM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
To: canuck_conservative
What's the status on the court hearing to determine the legality of the entire cannabis prohibition laws up there? I thought something was to be ruled on this spring. Looks like the only chance of the medical users to get the stuff is to do away with the law, the government wants to play the delay game for years.
8
posted on
04/21/2003 8:21:19 AM PDT
by
steve50
(neocons, the "new coke" of conservatives)
To: canuck_conservative
It must give Canadians a good feeling to know that the government running their health care, can't even grow grass right.
9
posted on
04/21/2003 8:26:08 AM PDT
by
Nachoman
To: steve50
Looks like the only chance of the medical users to get the stuff is to do away with the law, the government wants to play the delay game for years. What they need is a THC-based pill. That should do it, and it could be regulated like any other proscription. They were working on that once. I wonder what ever happened to the idea.
To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
11
posted on
04/21/2003 8:27:41 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(The average citizen in Baghdad,right now, has more firearm rights than anyone in our country.)
To: canuck_conservative
NORML may want to reconsider their stance on "decriminalization". Just look what govt. involvement will mean. Being a test subject sounds like a "headache" for those smoking the yard trimming placebo. Can they sue for abuse of their lungs?
12
posted on
04/21/2003 8:29:03 AM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
To: canuck_conservative
Rediculous, find one plant that is what they want and continuously clone it. That is exactly what the illegal growers do to increase yeild.
To: concerned about politics
What they need is a THC-based pill. That should do itThey have it---it's called Marinol. But patients with nausea have trouble keeping pills down, and the slow-onset nature of pills makes it harder to stop at the minimum effective dose.
14
posted on
04/21/2003 8:32:02 AM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
To: concerned about politics
What they need is a THC-based pill.
It turned out to be non-effective. I don't see any good reason to give the pharaceutical companies such a huge windfall profit anyway. Let those who wish to use it grow their own, take the profit potential out of it.
15
posted on
04/21/2003 8:33:48 AM PDT
by
steve50
(neocons, the "new coke" of conservatives)
To: Nachoman
It would probably have been cheaper in the long run, just to buy plane tickets for sick people to go to Amsterdam.
16
posted on
04/21/2003 8:34:18 AM PDT
by
Renfield
To: MrLeRoy
They have it---it's called Marinol. But patients with nausea have trouble keeping pills down, and the slow-onset nature of pills makes it harder to stop at the minimum effective dose. How about a nasel spray?
To: concerned about politics
They have it---it's called Marinol. But patients with nausea have trouble keeping pills down, and the slow-onset nature of pills makes it harder to stop at the minimum effective dose. How about a nasel spray?
It's a possibility---but imaginary delivery systems won't help today's patients.
18
posted on
04/21/2003 8:47:02 AM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
To: MrLeRoy
imaginary delivery systems won't help today's patients. If they can make the pill, they can make the spray yesterday. It would be an extract. It would be even easier, and the results immediate. Useable upon demand.
I think their biggest concern is the private growing. It could be sold easily, and they'd have a hard time controling the TAXING of it. I think it's a tax issue more than anything for the government. There's too many other ways for patients to get it as medicine. They just need a way to regulate the taxing of it first.
To: steve50
yep yep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson