To: Henrietta
While I agree that SP may indeed be guilty, why the refusal to interview material witnesses, merely because they might bring up something exculpatory to the accused? Seems a little suspicious to me.I can't link you to a previous thread, but I can tell you that there was one that ran which totally discredited the older couple claiming to have seen Laci.
There were major problems with their recollections. I read the thread with interest, but left it believing that they were just two people who had waaaay too much time on their hands, and were looking for their 15 minutes of fame.
211 posted on
04/20/2003 5:49:10 PM PDT by
mombonn
To: mombonn
"I can't link you to a previous thread, but I can tell you that there was one that ran which totally discredited the older couple claiming to have seen Laci.
There were major problems with their recollections. I read the thread with interest, but left it believing that they were just two people who had waaaay too much time on their hands, and were looking for their 15 minutes of fame."
I hadn't heard about that; thanks for the update. But you would still think that the cops would interview them, no?
To: mombonn
I can't link you to a previous thread, but I can tell you that there was one that ran which totally discredited the older couple claiming to have seen Laci. That's right. The man claimed to have been watching a football game on television that day, but there were no games that day.
245 posted on
04/20/2003 10:07:33 PM PDT by
laz17
(Socialism is the religion of the atheist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson