Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Henrietta
While I agree that SP may indeed be guilty, why the refusal to interview material witnesses, merely because they might bring up something exculpatory to the accused? Seems a little suspicious to me.

I can't link you to a previous thread, but I can tell you that there was one that ran which totally discredited the older couple claiming to have seen Laci.

There were major problems with their recollections. I read the thread with interest, but left it believing that they were just two people who had waaaay too much time on their hands, and were looking for their 15 minutes of fame.

211 posted on 04/20/2003 5:49:10 PM PDT by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: mombonn
"I can't link you to a previous thread, but I can tell you that there was one that ran which totally discredited the older couple claiming to have seen Laci.

There were major problems with their recollections. I read the thread with interest, but left it believing that they were just two people who had waaaay too much time on their hands, and were looking for their 15 minutes of fame."

I hadn't heard about that; thanks for the update. But you would still think that the cops would interview them, no?
215 posted on 04/20/2003 6:06:50 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: mombonn
I can't link you to a previous thread, but I can tell you that there was one that ran which totally discredited the older couple claiming to have seen Laci.

That's right. The man claimed to have been watching a football game on television that day, but there were no games that day.

245 posted on 04/20/2003 10:07:33 PM PDT by laz17 (Socialism is the religion of the atheist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson