Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Scott Peterson is Innocent'
Time Magazine ^ | April 20, 2003 | JILL UNDERWOOD

Posted on 04/20/2003 1:08:30 PM PDT by tessalu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-267 next last
To: pbear8

I triple guarantee you that Scott Peterson is innocent. There are no murderers in Modesto.

Do not seek Scott in jail, he is golfing with OJ.

I was fishing with him on Christmas Eve. We caught one this big.

201 posted on 04/20/2003 5:09:50 PM PDT by pbear8 ( sed libera nos a malo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: judgeandjury
And then Scott fell in love with another woman...

Yeah, a woman who could give better massages than 8 mo. pregnant, Laci.

202 posted on 04/20/2003 5:12:22 PM PDT by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: spectre; runningbear; RGSpincich
See post #201.
203 posted on 04/20/2003 5:13:47 PM PDT by pbear8 ( sed libera nos a malo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
"As guilty as Scott appears to me, I still would not like the police to get the idea in their head that I had done something wrong. Once that happens everything is tailored to fit that conception."

I'm especially bothered by the idea that they refused to interview some neighbors who saw Laci walking the dog AFTER Scott left for his fishing trip.

While I agree that SP may indeed be guilty, why the refusal to interview material witnesses, merely because they might bring up something exculpatory to the accused? Seems a little suspicious to me.
204 posted on 04/20/2003 5:25:12 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

There is an issue raised regarding other bodies/torsos being found in the bay.

This article was posted in today's San Jose Mercury News...


205 posted on 04/20/2003 5:25:18 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
The affair pretty much blew his credibility. You don't "adore each other" and then run around with a massage therapist, telling her you're single.

I am willing to keep an open mind. If it hadn't been for the affair, though--which completely punctures this image of a happy, well-adjusted couple--I would be far more likely to give him the benefit of the doubt.
206 posted on 04/20/2003 5:26:33 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Humidston; mombonn
Dittos to you both...the entire city would hear me screaming at my son if I found out that he was committing adultery, esp. if his wife was pregnant.

I remember reading that Scott is the youngest of 7....sounds like the spoiled youngest child syndrome (my own psychology) to me.

207 posted on 04/20/2003 5:28:25 PM PDT by Litany (The Truth shall set you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: pbear8
Or how about this one:

"Scott did not do this thing....superpower of Al Capone did"

208 posted on 04/20/2003 5:32:45 PM PDT by Litany (The Truth shall set you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill
"None of this proves that SP did or didn't kill his wife, but it certainly tells me that a husband should not concentrate on being 'helpful' or 'cooperative' to the cops no matter how innocent he is."

No kidding. The cops just want to close their case, and the best way to do that is by "ignoring" certain evidence that does not fit their theory of the case, and refusing to interview witnesses that don't fit their theory of the case, etc.

Which is why any attorney worth his salt will tell a husband in this situation to keep his mouth shut. Because anything he says to the police, no matter how innocent he is, will be considered "incriminating." The cops already have their minds made up.

BTW, I think SP is probably guilty. But his refusal to "cooperate" with the cops should not make him seem any more or less guilty.
209 posted on 04/20/2003 5:36:46 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
Lee Peterson: They made it sound like Laci loved that car. Laci hated that car.

Jackie Peterson: She called it a piece of shit. The only time I ever heard a bad word out of her mouth.

That makes Scott sound more guilty. He's working hard, they're struggling financially, and she's complaining about her car being "a piece shit".

210 posted on 04/20/2003 5:44:26 PM PDT by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
While I agree that SP may indeed be guilty, why the refusal to interview material witnesses, merely because they might bring up something exculpatory to the accused? Seems a little suspicious to me.

I can't link you to a previous thread, but I can tell you that there was one that ran which totally discredited the older couple claiming to have seen Laci.

There were major problems with their recollections. I read the thread with interest, but left it believing that they were just two people who had waaaay too much time on their hands, and were looking for their 15 minutes of fame.

211 posted on 04/20/2003 5:49:10 PM PDT by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Why would Scott talk about going to the water at all, had he taken Laci's body out there in a tarp and dumped it? There were no witnesses. Why would he place himself at the general scene of the crime?

He was in a densely populated area and any number of people could have seen him (and perhaps did and have submitted statements to the police detectives). He could have been cocksure that the body would not surface because he wrapped it in a tarp, tied concrete blocks to it, and dumped it way out in the bay.

212 posted on 04/20/2003 5:52:50 PM PDT by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
And Scott Ritter's wife didn't believe he went to the Burger King.
213 posted on 04/20/2003 6:00:54 PM PDT by doug from upland ((to Bill)"You are not fit to be commander in chief" -- father of Sgt. Shughart who died in Somalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tessalu; All
Scott Peterson Arraignment set for Monday, 4/21 in Modesto at 1:30 PM per KNBC Channel 3 news at 5 PM
214 posted on 04/20/2003 6:06:02 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi .. Support FRee Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mombonn
"I can't link you to a previous thread, but I can tell you that there was one that ran which totally discredited the older couple claiming to have seen Laci.

There were major problems with their recollections. I read the thread with interest, but left it believing that they were just two people who had waaaay too much time on their hands, and were looking for their 15 minutes of fame."

I hadn't heard about that; thanks for the update. But you would still think that the cops would interview them, no?
215 posted on 04/20/2003 6:06:50 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"Why would Scott talk about going to the water at all, had he taken Laci's body out there in a tarp and dumped it? There were no witnesses. Why would he place himself at the general scene of the crime?"

I am guessing because he was worried someone might have seen him at or around the scene and might remember having seen him, and he was covering that potential situation. Also he didn't expect Laci's body to break loose from the concrete he had it tied to. That's what I would guess. All accomplished liars mix fact in with their fiction to make the fiction more convincing.

216 posted on 04/20/2003 6:12:03 PM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

Comment #217 Removed by Moderator

To: The Boston Stranger
I see, makes sense. Coincidentally, the local news station here in Sacramento had an 'exclusive' interview. It was on the driveway but I don't know if it was the same 'exclusive' Time has. Another news channel reported the interview they had as Time's exclusive so I don't know if the one here that Channel Three had in the family's driveway was the same one from Time but they said the same things.

Actually, now that I think about it, you're probably right, the family might have requested it to get out their side of the story and to explain how Scott was framed.

What I was trying to say in my first post was that grieving families may make compelling TV but they don't always make sense. Like the one where the soldier was killed and the media went around crowing about the father blaming Bush for his son's death. Grief is a horrible emotion and I usually change the channel when I see someone distraught from it since I just wish they'd leave these poor people alone to grieve. I think some news outlets exploit it for ratings and/or to support their slant on whatever the subject is.

Thanks for the welcome. I've been around a long time, and had to get a new name because I moved. (If you change phone number and ISP--local ISP, that is--you have to "re-up.")

Why did you have to get a new name? I was able to keep mine when I went from dialup to cable although I tried to sign on from a different computer last week and couldn't remember my password to save my life.

218 posted on 04/20/2003 6:32:00 PM PDT by Lx (Scratch a liberal, find a fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: pbear8
He He {cough} giggle!
219 posted on 04/20/2003 6:42:40 PM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Right! And in fact we now hear of some guy who DID claim to see Scott there that day. There were so few people there, he noticed, and Scott probably noticed HIM, too. So he probably knew someone saw him there.
220 posted on 04/20/2003 6:46:19 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson