To: Mark Felton
You cant have it both ways, people who kill unborn babies are either murderers, or they are not. It doesnt matter if it is Scott Peterson killing an unborn baby, or a woman having an abortion. It is the same thing.
To: waterstraat
The question will hinge on what evidence they have. If the fetus was "removed" or came out of the mother on or about Dec 24, 2002, what kind of deterioration was suffereed by the fetus's corpse? Was there air and or water in the lungs? If the fetus took a single breath (the one breath rule) it was born and therefor "murderable".
To: waterstraat
You cant have it both ways, people who kill unborn babies are either murderers, or they are not. It doesnt matter if it is Scott Peterson killing an unborn baby, or a woman having an abortion. It is the same thing. Exactly. It doesn't make sense that Baby A (a wanted baby) is murdered... and Baby B (an unwanted baby) is not murdered, but aborted.
The baby is either a person, or not. I say the preborn baby is a person. And the law is inconsistent.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson