[TopQuark]

Issue - Does Public Policy favor the destruction of a well established local business, in order to render a tangential benefit to a non-resident company that prospectively might aid the local economy in the future?

Not at all: it is your prejudicial flavoring of the "issue."

The real property is not the same things as business and no one is destroying teh business --- although the owners portray it that way. The business could (i) move to another property a few hundred yards away, or (ii) rent the space in the towers.

tangential benefit You cetainly do not know how to do benefit-cost analysis in general and do not know the results of this one to claim that the benefits are tangential.

WHat's more disturbing, is that your "reading" of the situtation, down to the terms you use, is verbatim from texts on "scientific communism." With such views, what are you doing on a concervative board? Of what interest is it to you?

I HATE YUPPIES! I can see now why: they are an emblem of capitalism. They embrace and utilize the opportunities it provides, and move up as a result of their self-reliance. You, prefer otherwise, that is clear.

[The Cuban]

Yo,

Did you ask me to come up with an argument or to finish all relevant discovery within a 30 minute period? This is a basic argument, not a summation at trialafter all proofs have been shown. And point in fact, it is the only 24 hour diner in the neighborhood.