To: gcruse
You'd deny Bush your vote because you can't get a machine gun to kill deer and call it sport? Mercy. Indeed. But as one newbie pointed out, you don't really know the law. It's not the machine guns these nuts want to use to massacre deer and call it sport! It's the Abrams tanks! I suppose that in relative terms, to the Stormfront loonies, we're all DU trolls!
59 posted on
04/19/2003 6:13:08 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
(Subvert the dominant cliche!)
To: Revolting cat!
But as one newbie pointed out, you don't really know the law. It's not the machine guns these nuts want to use to massacre deer and call it sport! It's the Abrams tanks!
You're right, I don't know the law. As a result, I can't tell sarcasm from genuine RKBA concerns here. If none of it is sarcasm, though...some folks have some issues that Bush shouldn't fix.
67 posted on
04/19/2003 6:24:02 PM PDT by
gcruse
(The F word, N word, C word: We're well on our way to spelling 'France.')
To: Revolting cat!; gcruse; DrDeb
You dont know what you are talking about. You refer to weapons the ban has nothing to do with and make no mention of the firearms that the ban is about. This is why the ban must die. Too many people who are fed leftist propaganda like the term "assault weapon" and are ready to give up their rights for anything that a politician labels as an assault weapon. Next it will be "sniper rifles".
Of course as soon as you start talking about sporting purposes you've pretty much given yourself away as anti-2nd Amendment.
86 posted on
04/19/2003 7:10:55 PM PDT by
PuNcH
To: Revolting cat!
It's quite clear that you and your ilk are staunchly anti-2nd Amendment.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson