The size of the government and the budget are at record highs, the trampling of liberty and privacy is epidemic, and -- I'm sorry to say this -- but no conservative would have signed McCain-Feingold, just as no conservative would sign the assault weapons ban renewal.
All of you neo-heads and Bushies always seem to counter with 'WELL...he's better than [insert your liberal idiot here]' or 'Would you rather have Clinton?'
That's the best argument you've got? Yeah, he's better than all of the liberal idiots you can mention, and no, I wouldn't rather have Clinton. GW Bush is OUR Clinton, only he's slicker, and has real morals. What I want is a real conservative. And YES, YES, YES, I will stay home in 2004. But I had already planned that just about when McCain-Feingold was being signed.
I'm a one issue voter too. My issue is the preservation of the Republic. There is no candidate that supports my issue this time around.
Brought to you courtesy of the "conservative" purists who refused to vote for GW Bush because he failed to meet their arbitrary test for conservative purity.
But, hey, at least the Republic is preserved.
Yeah, thanks for nothin' Bushophobes.
The economy is better than it was in '92; it was better in '92, than the conglomerate of CBSNBCABCCNN and the N.Y. Slimes,L.A.Grimes,and the Washington comPost let on. Those days are over; happily.
Yeah, big boy...you show 'em; stay home on election day. That'll REALLY prove something; just what exactly , is patently obvious...YOU'RE STUPID !
One issue voters, those who claim to be " MORE CONSERVATIVE THAN THOU ", throw out " neo-con " as an impugnation, and can't see the forest for the trees, should NEVER vote anyway. WHY ? Becuase you've less political understang than the cretins on DU; that's why. And, you aren't Conservatives at all; just a pack of whiney children, who only imagine that they know what they're talking about, when it comes to politics and who didn't think that Reagan was a Conservative either, until after he left office.