Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ilgipper
I want some of what you guys are smoking. Yeah, yeah, Bush accomplished a lot...no question. But please, let's not insult Ronald Reagan and the rest of the REAL conservatives by calling GW Bush one.

The size of the government and the budget are at record highs, the trampling of liberty and privacy is epidemic, and -- I'm sorry to say this -- but no conservative would have signed McCain-Feingold, just as no conservative would sign the assault weapons ban renewal.

All of you neo-heads and Bushies always seem to counter with 'WELL...he's better than [insert your liberal idiot here]' or 'Would you rather have Clinton?'

That's the best argument you've got? Yeah, he's better than all of the liberal idiots you can mention, and no, I wouldn't rather have Clinton. GW Bush is OUR Clinton, only he's slicker, and has real morals. What I want is a real conservative. And YES, YES, YES, I will stay home in 2004. But I had already planned that just about when McCain-Feingold was being signed.

I'm a one issue voter too. My issue is the preservation of the Republic. There is no candidate that supports my issue this time around.

102 posted on 04/19/2003 7:44:09 PM PDT by ModernDayCato (Putting on asbestos underwear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: ModernDayCato
Ladies and Gentlemen, the President of the United States:

Brought to you courtesy of the "conservative" purists who refused to vote for GW Bush because he failed to meet their arbitrary test for conservative purity.

But, hey, at least the Republic is preserved.
Yeah, thanks for nothin' Bushophobes.


107 posted on 04/19/2003 7:48:35 PM PDT by Skooz (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: ModernDayCato
McCain-Feingold have brought the Dems to their collective knees. They didn't know what was in the Bill and thought that they didn't have to read it. Opperating on the assumption : " IF IT SOUNDS GOOD, PASS IT ", they managed to hurt themselves a very great deal. If you think that taking away " soft money ", which wastheir life's blood, isn't a biggie, then think again ! You have NO idea what any Conservative politician would and would NOT do. You wouldn't have signed it and that's because YOU are a poltical naif.

The economy is better than it was in '92; it was better in '92, than the conglomerate of CBSNBCABCCNN and the N.Y. Slimes,L.A.Grimes,and the Washington comPost let on. Those days are over; happily.

Yeah, big boy...you show 'em; stay home on election day. That'll REALLY prove something; just what exactly , is patently obvious...YOU'RE STUPID !

One issue voters, those who claim to be " MORE CONSERVATIVE THAN THOU ", throw out " neo-con " as an impugnation, and can't see the forest for the trees, should NEVER vote anyway. WHY ? Becuase you've less political understang than the cretins on DU; that's why. And, you aren't Conservatives at all; just a pack of whiney children, who only imagine that they know what they're talking about, when it comes to politics and who didn't think that Reagan was a Conservative either, until after he left office.

134 posted on 04/19/2003 9:08:30 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson