[SauronOfMordor]

Please explain to me you would accept the Kyoto Treaty, the International Criminal Court, higher taxes, UN control of our foreign policy, partial birth abortion, and a liberal Supreme Court for the next two decades for the right to carry a rapid-fire assault rifle.

Yes.

It's my "line in the sand". Recognise it. It's my price tag to the Republic party and fellow conservatives: back my "special issue" and I will back yours, even the ones that I'm not especially passionate about. Think my special issue is unimportant, and you can forget about my backing on any of your issues.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Think my special issue is unimportant, and you can forget about my backing on any of your issues.

If I didn't think your "special issue" was important, would I be asking you to explain it?

Do you have a line in the sand when it comes to the type of weapon people can have access to? ~~ Machine guns? ~~ Missles?

Seriously, do you believe "exercising a right" can ever cross into chaos?