Ask me if any Catholic cares about your impertinent and erroneous opinions.
Do you think that Bishop Carlson should tolerate Daschle any further given his track record on manning the tenches in favor of 45 million acts of baby slaughter and counting?
How do you know that no one in the hierarchy has "gently" taken Daschle to task privately? If someone did, would it be any of your business as a non-Roman non-Catholic?
How many acts of despicable lavender molestation of children were performed by priests and how many covered up by bishops? Not that even one instance is tolerable. Do you think 45 million babies sliced, diced and converted to bloody hamburger is not a matter of legitimate concern or that Daschle should not be called to account? And Ted the Swimmer and Ketchup Boy and Mikulski and Patrick Leahy and Christopher Dodd and Patty Murray and Dickie Durbin and Tom Harkin and a number of other sorry excuses for Catholics?
Why is it hypocrisy for Bishop Carlson to act against Daschle? Bishop Carlson seems unlikely to have been involved either in sexual misbehavior of his own or covering such misbehavior by others. Do you have some specific information to share on Bishop Carlson together with respectable links or are you just running your bigoted opinions without foundation?
Hence, we will label you for what you are unless and until you can show us your evidence as to Bishop Carlson. Catholics do not deny that there are serious problems in this Church as to the disgusting misbehavior of our liberals in the ranks of AmChurch bishops.
If you want to make a case against William Cardinal Keeler or Roger Cardinal Mahoney or the late and unlamented Joseph Cardinal Bernardin or the raving lavender AND coverup artist who disgraced the Milwaukee Archdiocese for so many years, Archbishop Rembert Weakland or all too many others, we will gladly join you and thereby give you credibility as one who posts the truth and does so not just because you disagree with our Faith. If you make unjustified character attacks on the good bishops like Carlson we will react every time and your credibility will be right up there with Jack Chick Comics.
If whatever your own personal interpretation of Scripture leads you to believe happens to be closer to the religious views of Jimmy Swaggert or Jim Bakker than to Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz or Bishop Carlson and the former two have been embarassed by personal scandals as Bishop Bruskewitz and Bishop Carlson have not, that proves nothing about who was right and who was wrong theologically. As a Catholic, I will not sink to the level of trying to discredit Swaggert and Bakker by their sins. You sin and I sin and they sin. So did Judas, Peter and Thomas. So what!
Truth is not determined by such criteria and you ought to think more of your own faith than to pretend that it does.
Uh...that's anti-Catholic bigot, Troll.
Let's keep our terms straight. Thanks.