To: Judith Anne
I read a little on that last year. Fascinating stuff. Definitely worth the time. One of the things they discovered was that keeping sick people outdoors gave people a much better chance of surviving, even if it was freezing outside (don't remember what they said about bad weather).
Oh, and the masks did NOTHING in 1918 (gotta put that out there so people can use the money on better things).
To: Democratic_Machiavelli
I don't think they had N95 masks in 1918, so I'm definitely hoping they're effective. Ordinary dust masks are about useless, imho.
62 posted on
04/18/2003 1:42:29 PM PDT by
Judith Anne
(God bless our soldiers with swift victory...)
To: Democratic_Machiavelli
Oh, and the masks did NOTHING in 1918 (gotta put that out there so people can use the money on better things).There's been a slight improvement in masks since 1918. Back then they were made of cloth with pores large enough to let anything smaller than a fly through. The tuberculosis mask used today filters out most particles larger than 0.1 micron.
63 posted on
04/18/2003 1:43:09 PM PDT by
Nebullis
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson