Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Judith Anne
I read a little on that last year. Fascinating stuff. Definitely worth the time. One of the things they discovered was that keeping sick people outdoors gave people a much better chance of surviving, even if it was freezing outside (don't remember what they said about bad weather).

Oh, and the masks did NOTHING in 1918 (gotta put that out there so people can use the money on better things).

60 posted on 04/18/2003 1:39:49 PM PDT by Democratic_Machiavelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Democratic_Machiavelli
I don't think they had N95 masks in 1918, so I'm definitely hoping they're effective. Ordinary dust masks are about useless, imho.
62 posted on 04/18/2003 1:42:29 PM PDT by Judith Anne (God bless our soldiers with swift victory...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: Democratic_Machiavelli
Oh, and the masks did NOTHING in 1918 (gotta put that out there so people can use the money on better things).

There's been a slight improvement in masks since 1918. Back then they were made of cloth with pores large enough to let anything smaller than a fly through. The tuberculosis mask used today filters out most particles larger than 0.1 micron.

63 posted on 04/18/2003 1:43:09 PM PDT by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson