Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aussies Feel Betrayed As 'Dead' Girl's Ruse Revealed
The National Post ^ | April 18, 2003 | Adrian Humphreys

Posted on 04/18/2003 7:35:44 AM PDT by Loyalist

Australian authorities were in the midst of prosecuting a man for the murder of a 14-year-old girl who vanished in 1998 when the Crown attorney made a startling revelation: Natasha Ryan was alive and well and had been hiding for nearly five years in her boyfriend's home.

It was firmly believed that Natasha had fallen prey to a suspected serial killer who was stalking women in the area. A long and expensive search was conducted and eventually an emotional memorial service held when hope for Natasha faded.

In fact, she ran away from home and became a hermit in her boyfriend's rental house, less than two kilometres from where her mother lived, hiding for hours in a wardrobe when visitors came and rarely venturing outside.

As a stunned nation learns more of the back-from-the-dead story, the joy that greeted news of her safe return is turning to anger.

Frustrated residents who searched frantically for her feel deeply betrayed.

Others question how a girl could let her parents go through the anguish of losing a child and force a man to wrongfully face a murder charge without intervening.

And when she almost immediately signed an exclusive promotional contract with a television and magazine conglomerate and a celebrity agent opened bidding to secure book and movie rights, it sent critics screaming.

"This is bizarre in the extreme and, now, to have a commercial arrangement where the alleged victim, or the family, or somebody else is going to be paid to tell the story, I just think cannot be tolerated," Lawrence Springborg, the opposition party leader, told reporters. "It shows absolutely no set of scruples or basic understanding of what the community at large is feeling about this."

On Sept. 2, 1998, Natasha vanished after leaving school in Rockhampton, a beautiful city 40 kilometres inland that sits astride Queensland's largest river.

Her disappearance rattled the community.

It was eerily timed. In quick succession, four other women and girls disappeared. It seemed a serial killer was in their midst.

Three months after Natasha disappeared, Julie Turner, 39, went missing. Three months after that, Beverley Leggo, 36, vanished. The next month, two victims fell: nine-year-old Keyra Steinhardt was snatched as she walked from school, raped and killed; and Sylvia Benedetti, 19, disappeared, her body later found by hikers.

Leonard John Fraser was a suspect in each of the incidents.

The serial sex offender was convicted for killing young Keyra and, while serving his sentence, took police to the remains of Ms. Turner, Ms. Leggo, and Ms. Benedetti.

Fraser had served 22 of the last 29 years in jail -- where he was nicknamed "Lenny the Loon" by prisoners -- before being released just months before Natasha disappeared.

It did not seem an inordinate leap for the family, the community and police to lump Natasha in with the list of the deceased.

Police said Fraser confessed in graphic detail to murdering Natasha to a cellmate.

Although her body was never found, the mystery, at least, seemed solved.

Natasha was found a week ago in the house of her boyfriend, Scott Black, a 27-year-old milkman, after an anonymous letter was sent to police.

It is suspected Natasha may have sent it, although others suspect members of Mr. Black's family.

She told police she stayed hidden because "the lie had become too big."

"I'm totally mixed up, I really am," her father said when told the news.

It would be difficult for Natasha not to know of the frantic search and anguish of her family during her self-imposed detention. She watched television and surfed the Internet, authorities said.

Her name was repeatedly in the news.

After the first Christmas passed with Natasha still missing, newspapers wrote of her mother, Jennifer Ryan, giving up hope.

In 1999, when a newspaper reported a possible sighting of Natasha, police were quick to deny the report. Mrs. Ryan said it was impossible: "I don't believe Natasha would have let me go through all the pain if she was out there," she said.

In May, 2001, about 70 family and friends gathered for a memorial service outside a crematorium chapel and released a bouquet of balloons on Natasha's 17th birthday.

Now, Natasha is shielded from the media by her agent. Turning 19 next month, she was seen frolicking in a bikini on the beach for the television show with the exclusive rights to her story. The station is withholding the interview until the ratings sweeps are on.

Disgust is palpable in the community. "Hermit turns bikini babe for TV" reads a headline in a local newspaper.

Authorities said they will look into the arrangements and see whether any money involved can be confiscated. An estimated $500,000 Australian was spent in searching for Natasha. It is possible she and Mr. Black will be charged for their deception.

Meanwhile, Fraser, 51, has been cleared of Natasha's murder but his trial continues on charges he murdered the other three women.

His lawyers have suggested they may call Natasha to the stand to discredit the prosecutor's case.

© Copyright 2003 National Post


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: australia; deception; hermit; hoax; leonardfraser; missinggirl; natasharyan; serialkiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
I can't think of too many teenagers with the brass and self-discipline to keep themselves hidden for five years just a mile-and-a-half from home, even to the point of letting a man go trial for their murder.

Throw the book at her and sue her for everything she's got or will ever have.

1 posted on 04/18/2003 7:35:44 AM PDT by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Even if the man's a dirtbag, one should never be convicted for a crime one didn't commit. I see nothing honorable about the way she and her family have behaved throughout this entire sordid affair.
2 posted on 04/18/2003 7:38:47 AM PDT by goldstategop ( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
maybe she was hiding from something more horrible than the deception that she created........
3 posted on 04/18/2003 7:46:42 AM PDT by is_is
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: is_is
Nevertheless its no excuse for what she did. You can't imagine what it feels like to wonder whether a loved one is dead or alive. This is sacrilege and there are no words to describe this situation.
4 posted on 04/18/2003 7:49:17 AM PDT by goldstategop ( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
There must be some angle that would put the blame on GW or the American military......../sarcasm
5 posted on 04/18/2003 7:49:39 AM PDT by CommandoFrank (Peer into the depths of hell and there is the face of Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
How about statutory rape and kidnapping for the boyfriend?

She was 14, he was 23?
6 posted on 04/18/2003 7:53:12 AM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
14-year old girl?

Can't the "boyfriend" be charged with statutory rape? Or isn't that a crime in Oz?
7 posted on 04/18/2003 7:57:35 AM PDT by Restorer (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
You can't say it is no excuse....you don't know why she left.....unless you have been sexually abused/beaten by a family member you have NO idea what that is like and you cannot use a healthy adult mind to say what or how a 14 year old reacts. I am not saying that is what happened but i will bet on it.....a 14 yr old does not do this if she comes from a funtional healthy home......therefore unless i am wrong about the circumstances of her home life.....the burden of guilt and fault lie with her parents.

8 posted on 04/18/2003 7:57:36 AM PDT by is_is
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
ROTFL!! I am currently being flamed on another Elizabeth Smart thread for DARING to suspect that she was actually a runaway, and the "kidknapping" was as phony as Ed Smarts crocodile tears.

This story seems to show that teenagers are capable of even stranger things.

9 posted on 04/18/2003 8:00:02 AM PDT by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: is_is
Their behavior definitely is no excuse. I don't care if you're a victim. There are rules in life to be followed and if one goes off onto the wrong path, sooner or later the consequences of what we've done will come back to recoil on us.
10 posted on 04/18/2003 8:04:57 AM PDT by goldstategop ( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
I think we require evidence of death before someone can be charged with murder. Maybe the Down Under is different.
11 posted on 04/18/2003 8:07:20 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
"Forget it Jake. It's Chinatown."
12 posted on 04/18/2003 8:08:05 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
I think that in most jurisdictions, it is not necessary to have the corpus delicti in order to charge and convict a person of murder.

Otherwise, bodies could be dumped at sea with impunity.

13 posted on 04/18/2003 8:25:14 AM PDT by Loyalist ("Of all the crosses I had to bear, the heaviest of all was the Cross of Lorraine."--Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Exactly. The principals in the famous "Billionaire Boys Club" case were tried and convicted of murder even though the deceased's body was never found.
14 posted on 04/18/2003 8:26:42 AM PDT by goldstategop ( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
ROTFL!! I am currently being flamed on another Elizabeth Smart thread for DARING to suspect that she was actually a runaway, and the "kidknapping" was as phony as Ed Smarts crocodile tears.

Teenagers do run away from home for stupid reasons, but that does not absolve adult men who lure them.

15 posted on 04/18/2003 8:32:18 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Hoe in the name of all that's holy did you derive that particular meaning from my post? I'm all for locking these scum up in concrete cells with no windows or doors for life- but then, you didn't ask, did you? You just "assumed" that I was ready to absolve them.

Interesting.

16 posted on 04/18/2003 9:05:01 AM PDT by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
I didn't accuse you of anything or make any assumptions about you or your motives. I simply finished your thought. If you make statements about the child's motives, you need to round off the thought to give a complete picture. Else you will go through life being misunderstood.
17 posted on 04/18/2003 9:17:20 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
I think that in most jurisdictions, it is not necessary to have the corpus delicti in order to charge and convict a person of murder.

Otherwise, bodies could be dumped at sea with impunity.

I regret to inform you bodies ARE very often dumped at sea with impunity.

-archy-/-

18 posted on 04/18/2003 10:11:07 AM PDT by archy (Keep in mind that the milk of human kindness comes from a beast that is both cannibal and a vampire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: js1138
When I am in need of someone to "finish my thought", I'll advertise. And YOU will not be one of the successful job-seekers.
19 posted on 04/18/2003 10:26:34 AM PDT by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Actually you must have the corpus delicti to charge for a crime. Of course you don't need a dead body.

Note: corpus delicti means "body of the crime" not "dead body." There must be some evidence (body) of a crime or at least the word of a snitch.

20 posted on 04/18/2003 10:29:43 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson