Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: putupon
First off, it was 60-mile swath.

Second, Sherman's army ate up all the food they came upon, inflicting great harm on the Confederacy, but this was something the rebels had already done in Maryland, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania. His troops destroyed did not (much) destroy private homes, etc. but did destroy war-related production facilities such as railroads.

Third, Sheridan's 1864 campaign in the Shenandoah Valley was far more destructive.


96 posted on 04/19/2003 8:28:32 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Grand Old Partisan
Whatever, but this doesn't square with your earlier post:

No, they went "above and beyond" by doing some pillaging of private homes, etc.

in regards to the 1st U. S. Alabama Cavalry falling out of favor with Sherman.

Again, the questions are

1. how did they fall out of favor with Sherman for doing what they were ordered to do? It would seem, if anything, they would get a medal or something for going "above and beyond" their duty when the object of the campaign was total destruction.

2. Per your statement pillaging of private homes, etc., Sherman's orders were to destroy only public property?

100 posted on 04/19/2003 8:42:29 AM PDT by putupon (I smack Chirac and Robbins too w/ my shoe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson