To: WhiskeyPapa; stainlessbanner; thatdewd; Colt .45; canalabamian; billbears; stand watie; ...
"There is -no- credible evidence that even a small number blacks served as soldiers in the rebel armies."
Would this be credible?? Capt. Heysinger was a Union Officer
Wednesday, September 10: At 4 o'clock this morning the Rebel army began to move from our town, Jackson's force taking the advance. The movement continued until 8 o'clock P.M., occupying 16 hours. The most liberal calculation could not give them more than 64,000 men. Over 3,000 Negroes must be included in the number. . . . They had arms, rifles, muskets, sabers, bowie-knives, dirks, etc. They were supplied, in many instances, with knapsacks, haversacks, canteens, etc., and they were manifestly an integral portion of the Southern Confederacy army. They were seen riding on horses and mules, driving wagons, riding on caissons, in ambulances, with the staff of generals and promiscuously mixed up with all the Rebel horde.
Capt. Isaac Heysinger
185 posted on
04/21/2003 8:10:21 AM PDT by
SCDogPapa
(In Dixie Land I'll take my stand to live and die in Dixie)
To: SCDogPapa
Wednesday, September 10: At 4 o'clock this morning the Rebel army began to move from our town, Jackson's force taking the advance. The movement continued until 8 o'clock P.M., occupying 16 hours. The most liberal calculation could not give them more than 64,000 men. Over 3,000 Negroes must be included in the number. . . . They had arms, rifles, muskets, sabers, bowie-knives, dirks, etc. They were supplied, in many instances, with knapsacks, haversacks, canteens, etc., and they were manifestly an integral portion of the Southern Confederacy army. They were seen riding on horses and mules, driving wagons, riding on caissons, in ambulances, with the staff of generals and promiscuously mixed up with all the Rebel horde. Capt. Isaac Heysinger
I don't know who this guy is, but this text was in a phamplet written and published in 1862 by a Dr. Lewis Steiner.
See this link:
http://www.edinborough.com/Life/AtFront/Steiner.htm
Where'd you get your info? SCV or League of the South? Hate groups don't make real objective sources.
Walt
187 posted on
04/21/2003 8:16:40 AM PDT by
WhiskeyPapa
(Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
To: SCDogPapa; stainlessbanner; thatdewd; Colt .45; canalabamian; billbears; stand watie
See also #179 in this thread.
How very odd.
Walt
189 posted on
04/21/2003 8:20:33 AM PDT by
WhiskeyPapa
(Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
To: SCDogPapa; stainlessbanner; thatdewd; Colt .45; canalabamian; billbears; stand watie
The most liberal calculation could not give them more than 64,000 men. Anyone with even a slight knowledge of the ACW knows that Lee's army at Antietam was only 40-45,000. No matter who wrote this (and Dr. Steiner definitely did), he's not very credible.
Neither are you.
Walt
194 posted on
04/21/2003 8:27:55 AM PDT by
WhiskeyPapa
(Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson