To: kesg; AmericanInTokyo
Does anyone know why Bush would do such a thing? I certainly don't see how it helps any peace process to grant such a waiver. What am I missing? By keeping the PLO's American office open, survielence costs are already fixed as it is only one location. Close that location and the all the roaches spread out and subsequent intelligence and law enforcement costs will increase substantially. We are treating the PLO office just like the embassy of a hostile country, logging everyone who leaves and enters, the date and time and who with.
8 posted on
04/17/2003 1:21:24 PM PDT by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: jriemer
Bingo!!!!. we have a winner....
14 posted on
04/17/2003 1:31:49 PM PDT by
ken5050
To: jriemer
Okay, your explanation makes some sense to me.
17 posted on
04/17/2003 1:36:45 PM PDT by
kesg
To: jriemer
Yeah, and what do you think the PLO office is doing? just sitting around? or mapping out the city when the time is right for a terrorist attack.
By your logic, you would say it would be ok to have a North Korean embassy here?
Futhermore, its not just about that. Its also about the fact the government recognizes the PLO as some sort of government. They are not a government, but a terrorist organization.
18 posted on
04/17/2003 1:37:33 PM PDT by
yonif
To: jriemer
"By keeping the PLO's American office open, survielence costs are already fixed as it is only one location."
...or so the French would have us believe...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson